clively wrote:
Ravenous D wrote:There is actually a video interview with the Author of "spots the space marine" and she doesn't give a lot of details or go into what happened with
GW, which basically means they more then likely just handed her a big settlement.
Sorry, but the *only* way
GW would pay the Author is if she had indicated a counter suit was coming and it would never be defined as "big".
Some mitigating factors here:
1. The book was essentially an unknown with very very few sales.
2. She received essentially free press out of this and her sales shot up immediately after it was put online.
3. Going any further on her, or
GWs part, was going to result in a fair amount of legal fees that would easily eclipse any amount of money possible to recover out of this.
If I was the attorney, I'd tell the author to keep quiet and be thankful that
GW had done this and fairly quickly backed off. For once, someone other than an attorney actually benefited.
I too think it is unlikely
GW paid her any money, but for very different reasons. The situation was resolved by Amazon being informed that it had no earthly reason to remove the content. Over. Done. Nothing more to discuss unless the author decided to sue for damages. But she had no real reason to. There was no longer a threat, the situation was resolved, and her counsel was pro bono.
GW merely got lucky. If she had filed a suit against
GW, there would be a record of it, and if she had,
GW would have had every reason in the world to write her a fat, fat check to get clear of the situation and keep it quiet. There was so much bad press and
GW was so solidly in the wrong that it would have been well worth 6 figures to get clear of the situation. Not only was
GW facing the possibility of stiff damages, but
GW would have almost certainly lost the Space Marine trademark. Imagine Kirby putting that in a financial report.
But, that probably is not what happened. I have not looked to see if a suit was filed, but I have not heard there was, so I am assuming there was not. Someone feel free to correct me if my assumption is incorrect. If I was her lawyer, I would not have told her to be thankful
GW backed off. I would tell her to be thankful Amazon did the right thing, and tell her that if
GW bothers her about it again, we'll sue them until they kiss your feet, beg for forgiveness, and pay you enough money to putna down payment on a new house and turn Spots into an 8 book series.