Switch Theme:

[1000] - Eldar - Competative  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Troubled By Non-Compliant Worlds




Autarch: fusion gun 80

5 Dire Avengers 65
• Wave Serpent: Holo-fields; twin-linked scatter laser 135
5 Dire Avengers 65
• Wave Serpent: Holo-fields; twin-linked scatter laser 135
5 Dire Avengers 65
• Wave Serpent: Holo-fields; twin-linked scatter laser 135

Crimson Hunter 160
5 Swooping Hawks 80
5 Swooping Hawks 80

1,000 points

Okay so I've come up with this eldar list and im wondering if it is theoretically strong. The main game plan, for if the ball is in my court, is to come up the board carefully by using cover and staying together with my 3 serpants. When my reserves start to come on that's when I will start to apply my list against the enemy with the scourges first going for heavy armour or light infantry by DS'ing down in cover and then moving in for the kill with fleet and a 12'' move. Even impetial Knights will have trouble with 5 I5 haywire cc attacks if they get caught off guard. The Crimson hunter is the AA. Everything else is handled by the serpants and the DA. I plan to drop off some DA in cover if there's an objective there whilst I push forwards. MC can be tackled and meq can be dealt with through weight of numbers. I'll just have to take into many variables if I drop my shields ex. Enemy reserves, anti tank and even heavy hitting cc if there are those units close by. What do you guys think?
   
Made in gb
Furious Fire Dragon




Peterborough, England.

I'd be tempted to swap out 5 swooping hawks for 3 Jetbikes with or without a cannon, and then upgrade some serpents with Cannons, Great for objectives, great for damage output, I'd personally run a wriathknight instead of a crimson Hunter as the Wave Serpents fill a psuedo AA role. But that's probably a preference for me

   
Made in gb
Jealous that Horus is Warmaster





take out the hawks and take a fire prism or war walkers with bright lances as this list has a severe deficiency of anti armour.
   
Made in gb
Secret Inquisitorial Eldar Xenexecutor





UK

MC can be tackled and meq can be dealt with through weight of numbers


One thing you can almost guarantee with this list is that you wont have weight of numbers. Stacking at a mighty 26 infantry models the forces using MC (tau, nids, ghost dar) will almost certainly have the same, or more models than you have on the field.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/01/19 17:37:12


Soon his foes would learn that the only thing more dangerous than a savage three hundred pound brute is a savage three hundred pound brute with a plan - Ork Codex

30K Imperial Fist Progress
Tale of 6 Gamers - 30K

I've recently started taking on commissions, if you'd like to talk a project over feel free to PM me here, or find me at:
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/BasiliskStudios
Email: Basilisk.Studios@yahoo.co.uk 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Army Lists
Go to: