Switch Theme:

Not painting terrain  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in au
Regular Dakkanaut





I was wondering what people's thoughts were about not painting terrain (or at least not extensively). My thoughts around this were that I was wondering whether for basing using river sand, for small boulders using small pebbles, for walls using rocks etc etc. I am wondering whether this would lead to better looking terrain that base coating everything and then trying to get to colours right by painting?
   
Made in au
Incorporating Wet-Blending




Sydney

I think the problem with not painting basing terrain is that you don't get as much coherence, and it looks wrong to scale. If you can find terrain that goes together well, go for it.
   
Made in us
Fresh-Faced New User




It's one thing to do terrain for trains it's another to do it for wargaming. I have tried in the past to use ballast in different ways even mixing it to get variation and it never looked right, especially with a painted model on it.

Try it out see how you like it. Also just as a side note, don't buy fancy over priced ballast for basic sand. Find yourself some hobby sand, it is usually a rough/fine grain, cheap and versatile.
   
Made in us
Gargantuan Gargant





Binghamton, NY

Some people do it, but I don't (and simply won't). As mentioned, unpainted natural materials tend to look out of scale. We recognize them for exactly what they are - tiny objects in 1:1 scale. Painting, though, is naturally understood to be illusory. We recognize that yellowish grainy stuff under a model to mean it's standing on sand, regardless of the actual material, grain size, etc. used to create the terrain. It seems odd, painting sand to look like sand and rocks like rocks, but the more visually cohesive results are worth the additional effort, IMO.

The Dreadnote wrote:But the Emperor already has a shrine, in the form of your local Games Workshop. You honour him by sacrificing your money to the plastic effigies of his warriors. In time, your devotion will be rewarded with the gift of having even more effigies to worship.
 
   
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: