Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:26:31
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
I have been playing plenty of armies, but most of them are getting stale. Orks and IG, for example, are mostly based around bringing more dakka and more bodies than the enemy. SM are based around damn good stats. They are simply too forgiving to play.
What I am looking for is an army that has close to zero margin of error. If I play my game right, I will shred my enemy in record time, but one mistake and my army will disintegrate into rainbow confetti.
I do not want to survive because of numbers or stats, but with positioning, deployment, maybe even psychic powers to prevent the enemy from retaliating. For those who played WoW, imagine a Rogue. If you play your game right, go get the enemy from 100% to 0% in one go. If you feth up, you die.
Basically, I am looking for a challenge without spamming or relying on stats, but rather an army that I need to get good at and grow with and use my brain rather than boatloads of dice.
I hope you can help me with that.
Thanks for any input
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:37:12
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Powerful Phoenix Lord
|
So Dark Eldar?
They epitomize the Glass Cannon. They can hit hard and fast, but one screw up and you'll get wiped.
At least that is how it was pre-7th edition. Not sure if it still holds true.
|
Greebo had spent an irritating two minutes in that box. Technically, a cat locked in a box may be alive or it may be dead. You never know until you look. In fact, the mere act of opening the box will determine the state of the cat, although in this case there were three determinate states the cat could be in: these being Alive, Dead, and Bloody Furious.
Orks always ride in single file to hide their strength and numbers.
Gozer the Gozerian, Gozer the Destructor, Volguus Zildrohar, Gozer the Traveler, and Lord of the Sebouillia |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:37:29
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
Harlequins
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:43:29
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Committed Chaos Cult Marine
|
Sisters of Battle!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:44:19
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Thermo-Optical Hac Tao
|
A different game?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:45:41
Subject: Re:Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Trustworthy Shas'vre
california
|
Do both. Dark eldar are exactly what you just described. Harlies add the cc they only get via incubi.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:46:43
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
No. They are just another PA codex with some ribbons tacked on. DE and Harlies do sound interesting. To be frank, DE are one of the two armies I never played (the other being nids) and I only once played against them (and won by a lot) so I know close to nothing about them. I do not think Harlies make for a good main army, so I will leave them for now (and re-consider if I choose an Eldar-type army). In case it matters, I am aiming for tournament level of play (my meta alone is highly competitive and plentiful, with power lists close to everywhere). Not sure if DE is good enough for that. I am looking for a challenge, not an impossible undertaking
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/02/28 21:49:27
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 21:58:53
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Tunneling Trygon
|
Dark Eldar have the juice to compete with any list out there, ESPECIALLY with Eldar Psychic support and perhaps Harlequin support as well. Easy to throw in a Farseer and a couple Objective grabbing Jetbikes (and I'm actually liking Vypers running with Reavers but that's your choice). You can absolutely use the three armies to make a high speed, high power and still very fragile army. The 3+ "power" of Jetbikes can be offset by low numbers, really needing good placement and timing. The list would have to be VERY high risk, and VERY high reward.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 22:08:52
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
Having played Saim-Hann Eldar during 6ed and 7ed, I can say that they are the exact opposite of a fragile army. Wave Serpents are toughness level of Land Raiders unless faced with Ignore Cover. And don't get me started on the Wraith units...
Having looked into the Harlies, I really like the Psychic powers going on there. Veil of Tears, Cover Saves and that reverse Invisibility and access to Telepathy and negative Ld modifiers can make for an interesting army all about controlling the enemy. In the best case scenario the opponent only does things you allow him to do.
But to get back the DE issue at hand. Does anyone have an example list or maybe a good advice where to start? As strange as it sounds to me, I am going into unfamiliar territory in 40k. Never thought I'd ever say that
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 22:38:33
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Secretive Dark Angels Veteran
Canada
|
I think that the hardest army to Play would be militarium tempestus because you have no magic bag of tricks to play with. In other armies you have relic tables, supplements, forgeworld imperial armor, and army specific units. The tempestus have literally none of that. Ita about the bare essentials if troop movement and deployment, vehicle selection and pairing them with squads and the careful application of commanders as force multipliers in your force.
Imo it takes raw skill at the game to do well with tempestus and not relying on gimmicks or cheesy game abuses/codex loopholes. Because you don't have any loopholes you have a bunch of dudes, their troop transports, and a bare field commander
|
DA army: 3500pts,
admech army: 600pts
ravenguard: 565 pts
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 22:49:31
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Ancient Chaos Terminator
|
I agree with dark eldar or harlequins. Glass cannon armies are exactly what you are searching for.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 22:58:36
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
Having done some superficial research into some DE lists.. they do feel rather spammy. I mean, you are basically taking Ravagers, Blasterborn and Warriors in Venoms and Raiders respectively.
I am sort of lacking those little tricks you can do with some armies. This is, again, another case of bringing more dakka than the enemy (albeit on more fragile platforms) without much thought behind it. I agree that this army requires exceptional positioning and movement, but they can not do much in terms of controlling and handicapping the enemy. A good step, but not big enough step in the right direction.
But as I said, it was a superficial look and I am still looking for a pointer for DE info.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 23:01:50
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Locked in the Tower of Amareo
|
Play BA. There is nothing forgiving about BA at all.
" SM are based around damn good stats"
Not really. Most marine lists are based around grav cents and grav bikers. Their stats have little to do with it. In fact, many Xeno lists render many marine stats useless, like WS and S.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 23:03:23
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Veteran Knight Baron in a Crusader
|
Another vote for DE with allied harlequins. That army would fit what you're looking for perfectly.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 23:40:04
Subject: Re:Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Latest Wrack in the Pits
|
While it's true that Dark Eldar are famous for spamming transports, and are quite good at it, our codex is balanced such that there is no "right" way to play them. Even Wytches are ok in the right circumstances. For non vehicle options check out Haemonculus Covens
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/02/28 23:48:18
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Trade_Prince wrote:What I am looking for is an army that has close to zero margin of error. If I play my game right, I will shred my enemy in record time, but one mistake and my army will disintegrate into rainbow confetti.
Then you want a close combat army.
With long range shooting, if you miss on turn 1, you'll get a chance to hit again on turn 2 and 3. With close combat, you might not get the charge in at all, and if you do, you might only get one, so you better have made sure enough of you survived/killed enough of their stuff to be able to do well, because you can still lose the close combat, even if you charged.
Not only is CC more challenging in general, but it's more challenging than usual with this version of the main rulebook. This is probably the most hostile time in 40k to the idea of an easy win with a CC army.
Of course, lots of armies can do close combat, so that isn't THAT much of a differentiator. I guess what I'd do to ratchet the challenge level up again would be to find a version of close combat that's weaker, or is close combat in a non-close-combat army. So, for example, play a CC army that's a horde. Bump it up again if it's a CC horde from, guard, or either eldar or something.
But if you only one to take a step or two up the challenge ladder, then go hunting for one of the stronger CC armies.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 00:23:28
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought
The oceans of the world
|
Eldar of any type. While DE are a glass cannon, regular Eldar are supposed to be that way, but somewhere in the codex there was a wrong term and they lost it
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 00:29:00
Subject: Re:Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
Interestingly enough you don't actually need a different army. What you need is a different play style of the armies you have.
You should check out the LVO top lists. A number of those lists are geared toward tactical flexibility, mobility, and damage rather than durability.
Whether forgeworld is an option will also open up a lot of different mobile, high damage builds. The Elysian Drop Troops lists are all like this and the new death rider detachment w/ siege drills seems to fit this as well. Without forgeworld a high risk - high reward army that is fun and competitive is the drop vets lists that recently became possible.
An example of a drop pod vets list that placed 4th overall at the LVO;
http://bloodofkittens.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/02/Geoff-Thompson-4th-Best-Overall-Las-Vegas-Open-2015.pdf
Biker armies are also fragile relative to their points costs. If you mess up with them the situation snow balls rapidly.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 00:55:25
Subject: Re:Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I concur with those who said DE. They play much differently than almost every other army because of their army-wide fragility. You really have to understand how each unit synergizes with your other units. Your games will be won (or lost) in the movement phase, with your target priority also playing a crucial factor in how you do. Also definitely check out the Covens supplement. The most fun I've had in 7th ed. is using the formation from the Covens book along with the regular DE codex. If you can win consistently with DE then you're a pretty good general.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 03:31:02
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Dark elder...
|
40k Orks 12000 points and growing
Ultramarines 2500
Salamanders 3500
Necrons 4000
Skitarii/cult mech 2500
Vampire Counts 3000 Points
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 03:40:44
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Journeyman Inquisitor with Visions of the Warp
|
Trade_Prince wrote:
What I am looking for is an army that has close to zero margin of error. If I play my game right, I will shred my enemy in record time, but one mistake and my army will disintegrate into rainbow confetti.
I do not want to survive because of numbers or stats, but with positioning, deployment, maybe even psychic powers to prevent the enemy from retaliating. For those who played WoW, imagine a Rogue. If you play your game right, go get the enemy from 100% to 0% in one go. If you feth up, you die.
Run MT with the DA Librarius Conclave, its exactly this. You will be outnumbered, outgunned, and outarmored at all times. All you will have are some very dirty tricks and special abilities, which you had better manage perfectly if you want to survive. Nothing is disposable, attrition is not an strategy, and you are going to have to win the game with your choices as the player (because your units most certainly won't do it for you).
What's on your side? Fast and punchy transports, 11 psychic ML's, deep strike on everything except Ezekiel, plasma and melta everywhere, 4++ on anything you want, Orders that let S3 Lasguns kill Wraithknghts, Fearless on everything, or 4x Jump Librarians with Force Weapons combining to make a Voltron deathstar... How is this NOT popular? Oh yeah... something like 40 models and 5 AV11 vehicles at 1850pts. It's like XCOM Ironman Impossible in 40k. Sadistically unforgiving.
Good luck dude... if you choose this army, you're going to need it!
|
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/03/01 03:49:09
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 04:41:23
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
If people play 30k near you or you're allowed to do 30k v 40k... Corax Raven Guard would be awesome and different.
But yeah Harlequins and DE sound like what you are looking for.
|
DO:70S++G++M+B++I+Pw40k93/f#++D++++A++++/eWD-R++++T(D)DM+
Note: Records since 2010, lists kept current (W-D-L) Blue DP Crusade 126-11-6 Biel-Tan Aspect Waves 2-0-2 Looted Green Horde smash your face in 32-7-8 Broadside/Shield Drone/Kroot blitz goodness 23-3-4 Grey Hunters galore 17-5-5 Khan Bikes Win 63-1-1 Tanith with Pardus Armor 11-0-0 Crimson Tide 59-4-0 Green/Raven/Deathwing 18-0-0 Jumping GK force with Inq. 4-0-0 BTemplars w LRs 7-1-2 IH Legion with Automata 8-0-0 RG Legion w Adepticon medal 6-0-0 Primaris and Little Buddies 7-0-0
QM Templates here, HH army builder app for both v1 and v2
One Page 40k Ruleset for Game Beginners |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 04:58:41
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Dark Angels Librarian with Book of Secrets
|
Dark Eldar all the way. They are absolutely challenging, but can be really rewarding when you play them right.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/03/01 04:58:59
~1.5k
Successful Trades: Ashrog (1), Iron35 (1), Rathryan (3), Leth (1), Eshm (1), Zeke48 (1), Gorkamorka12345 (1),
Melevolence (2), Ascalam (1), Swanny318, (1) ScootyPuffJunior, (1) LValx (1), Jim Solo (1), xSoulgrinderx (1), Reese (1), Pretre (1) |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 05:20:47
Subject: Re:Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Sister Vastly Superior
canada
|
Sisters of battle and use all their unit options!
|
They say you never appreciate what you have until it is gone. I fear that isn't true for your mind. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 05:27:21
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Another vote for Dark Eldar. They rely on fast, hard attacks which require a lot of strategy. You might think they look like they're spammy, but they're not broken. They have a lot of transports and webway portals to allow them to get where they need to be. They excel at surgical strikes vs wars of attrition. If you don't kill something instantly, it's going to hurt, and you have to have enough foresight to keep the opponent on their toes. Nobody will ever gripe about your DE army being broken, as everything is so fragile that it falls apart if you slip up.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 05:30:18
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Unhealthy Competition With Other Legions
|
Chaos space marines. Using actual Chaos Marine squads, chosen squads and raptor squads.
|
"He's doing the Lord's work. And by 'Lord' I mean Lord of Skulls." -Kenny Boucher
Prepare yourselves for the onslaught men. The enemy is waiting, but your Officers are courageous and your bayonettes sharp! I have at my disposal an entire army of Muskokans, tens of thousands of armour and artillery supporting millions upon tens of millions of the Imperium's finest fighting men with courage in their bellies, fire in their hearts and lasguns in their hands. Emperor show mercy to mine enemies, for as sure as the Imperium is vast, I will not!
- General Robert Thurgood of the Emperor's Own Lasguns before the landings at Traitor's Folly at the onset of the Chrislea's Road Campaign
"Pride goeth before the fall... to Slaanesh"
- ///name stricken///, former 'Emperor's Champion' |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 06:51:23
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Shunting Grey Knight Interceptor
|
I found GK had a great learning curve, Yeah they are SM but with their now low model count because inq got removed they can easily get punished with a wrong move but when you are on fire you know it because your army just flows.
|
A haiku, by Deadpool: I hate broccoli / And think it totally sucks / Why is it not meat? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 08:19:02
Subject: Re:Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
Raven Cowl wrote:While it's true that Dark Eldar are famous for spamming transports, and are quite good at it, our codex is balanced such that there is no "right" way to play them. Even Wytches are ok in the right circumstances. For non vehicle options check out Haemonculus Covens
I wouldn't like to lose my speed, but beyond that I welcome any non transport spam suggestions.
As for the Coven. There is basically one faction amongst the Eldar I have no gripes with, and those are Corsairs. I think a DE army could make decent Corsairs with all their sails and pirate-like looks. However, not sure if space pirates would run around with giant flesh hulks. Any conversion ideas to stick with the theme?
(and no, FW Corsair list is not an option  )
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 12:25:40
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Shas'ui with Bonding Knife
|
Tau!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/03/01 12:47:13
Subject: Looking for a challenging army
|
 |
Death-Dealing Devastator
|
As a matter of fact, I was very close to choosing Tau. I played them a good while and the JSJ and ML shenanigans were fairly interesting. However, I am not to big on the unit design. Something about those Eldar sails (those on DE vehicles) turns me on. Maybe because I like sailing? Who knows
|
|
 |
 |
|