Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I've found tons of opinions. But has anyone actually tabled one? The rules look like fun, but we know what's on paper doesn't always equal playability.
If anyone has, which one did you use and was it worth the point investment?

What is it you are asking about..? Do you mean the Ork Killa Kans? While I havent used them myself, A friend has used them against me and they can be nasty.. The Grotzookas seem very evil, Just bombarding you with blasts..

I have used cans multiple times through out my life, judge me if you will but I will continue to use cans.

ACK!!!! Didn't catch that autocorrect got me
Actually it was supposed to be c'tan.

The C'tan are weird. They have to roll for your power after choosing a target. It's really annoying to deal with, they can be worth it, but for most lists, just use the points for more warriors or something

I've fought against 'em in Apocalypse a couple of times. They're pretty killy, but the general consensus seems to be that they're just too expensive for what they do, especially in small games where point allocation is tighter.

I stand by my statement that I do and will continue to use cans.

I use the nightbringer in just about any game I play.
His unique ability really helps mitigate some (but sadly not all) the lack of defense.

Conclave of the burning one is just downright nasty.
"Hey I heard you had a gunline, can my C'tan be part of it? No? DIE!"

tanker19 wrote:
ACK!!!! Didn't catch that autocorrect got me
Actually it was supposed to be c'tan.

you autocorrect!!!