Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 Melissia wrote:
I'd prefer to see actual Sisters stuff rather than regurgitated Inquisition/Ecclesiarchy crap. I was never interested in freakshow armies.

Feel the same way. Was angry when they lumped the Inquisiton in with the Grey Knights. I hope they don't lump the sisters in with anything and they they update them!! They are like the 40k equivalent of the Bretonians.

It's one thing to tie armies together, it's another thing to make it dependent on each other. What I mean by that is the GK codex is Grey Knights where you can have some Inquisitional and Witch Hunter bits in the army if you want. It's much much harder to make a unique and fun Inquisitional army without having the GK in it. Where, before they mixed them and the Inquisition and Witch Hunters had their own codex, I had a fun and effective and unique Inquisition army.