Switch Theme:

Camouflage - Am I doing it wrong?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Fresh-Faced New User






Pardon my horrible lack of prior knowledge and a decent camera; but for my Tau army, I decided to go with a sort of ocean camouflage scheme. I applied a blue basecoat, used nuln oil to fill in the crevices of this drone then painted on my pattern (for lack of a full paint set the drone is yet to be finished).

Did I go horribly wrong in applying the pattern too early/too late, and if so, what's the correct way to go about it?
[Thumb - drone.jpg]
A drone I tested out this paint scheme with.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/05/27 02:26:36


 
   
Made in au
Incorporating Wet-Blending




Sydney

I think that is pretty good, some more angles and using a camera instead of a potato would be handy to confirm though
   
Made in gb
Thane of Dol Guldur





Bodt

Yeah need some better shots mate. If you want to make the camo a bit less blocky, you can apply your lighter stripes, then stipple the edges with an old brush which will give you more of a fade effect

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/05/27 11:10:09


Heresy World Eaters/Emperors Children

Instagram: nagrakali_love_songs 
   
Made in gb
Regular Dakkanaut




Dublin

It looks a heck of a lot better than most peoples first stab at camo (as far as i can tell b/c camera seems to be covered in vaseline)

40k Armies :

Fantasy Armies:

DA:90SG+M-B--I+Pw40k99#--D++++A++/wWD232R++T(M)DM+

"We of the bloody thumb, salute you" - RiTides, Grandmaster of the Restic Knights 
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






There's no such thing as a wrong way; just whatever's easiest for you. Some people paint, shade and highlight the underlying colour completely before adding the second (and third, etc) colours, some do it diffferently.

In your case, both colours are similar - blue-greys. Doing both colours then putting a shading wash over the top works pretty well there, and can help to tie the two colours together. If you had something like grey and tan, for example, I'd consider shading them separately because the two colours would be quite different.

A better photo would help. Try taking it outside in daylight if you've got no other artificial light sources.
   
Made in gb
Decrepit Dakkanaut





Nottinghamshire

Worry not. It looks fine, the idea of camo is to break up the shape - as the drone is so small, you have successfully done that. If you make the pattern any smaller, it will look very strange when you start to paint larger units.


[ Mordian 183rd ] - an ongoing Imperial Guard story with crayon drawings!
[ "I can't believe it's not Dakka!" ] - a buttery painting and crafting blog
 
   
Made in us
Ship's Officer





Dallas, TX

Camo pattern looks good, you just need to add another color to the camouflage overlapping a little bit. Then use a detail brush to pick out the lens etc. and add the decal marking.
   
Made in gb
Fixture of Dakka






 Buttery Commissar wrote:
Worry not. It looks fine, the idea of camo is to break up the shape - as the drone is so small, you have successfully done that. If you make the pattern any smaller, it will look very strange when you start to paint larger units.


In theory, yes. In practice, on miniatures, it's better to simply suggest the idea of camouflage patterns. otherwise it works too well, and you end up with what looks like a shapeless blob. That, and the difficulty of painting them, is why camo patterns on miniatures tend to be much simpler than real life.
   
Made in ca
Fresh-Faced New User






As per request, here's a few shots of the model with a camera instead of a potato, I appreciate your tips and feedback!

Though it probably does look a bit messier without all the film grain now.
[Thumb - IMG_0403.JPG]

[Thumb - IMG_0404.JPG]

[Thumb - IMG_0406.JPG]

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/05/27 14:12:58


 
   
Made in de
Hardened Veteran Guardsman




Shanghai, China

Blue ocean camo for a flying object? Well, I guess you have your explanation for that I think the pattern needs to be smaller with additional colors for more contrast. Looks too much like brush strokes to me atm. Adding an off-white and darkblue like here for example:
http://s707.photobucket.com/user/lrdlion/media/untitled.jpg.html

I would add the wash after painting. Oh and highlighting camo is a b$&ยง%.

Personally I think blue/grey camo patterns are urban camo and should have digital patterns, using templates. Like here:
http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/483238.page

I messed around with (oak leaf spring) camo for my DKOK. Check this youtube channel for some great tutorials on - mostly real WW2 - camo patterns:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXUyQpCqwIM
   
 
Forum Index » Painting & Modeling
Go to: