Switch Theme:

Has Eldar D Weaponry Had an Impact?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in ca
Lord of the Fleet






Halifornia, Nova Scotia

Pain4Pleasure wrote:
If saying someone is waac is being a keyboard warrior, you've just insulted 90% of dakka community. Since it isn't, and you're only trying to get a rise out of me, I'll ignore you from now on.


WAAC is very heavily overused by a lot of people for the wrong reasons.

Not knowing the context of Xerics entire list, their opponent's list, any pre-arranged negotiations/expectations, and general community style, calling a poster WAAC based on a few units is rather keyboard warrior-ish and generally not appropriate.

Further, this thread is about D weaponry. In it, people are going to post about if they used them, or if they were playing against them. We should be encouraging people to post their feedback on this matter, rather than immediately resorting to childish namecalling.
Made in ca
Lord of the Fleet






Halifornia, Nova Scotia

I personally think removing D weapons from the standard game is the best answer.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: