Switch Theme:

Jinking without moving  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Devastating Dark Reaper






Can you jink without having moved, say on the first turn if you went second?

I e always played it as you can't, but I can't actually see that limitation in the rules - it was in 6th maybe?

3500 | 1000 
   
Made in lu
Rampaging Khorne Dreadnought






It's just a universal special rule. If somebody tries to shoot a unit that can jink...they can jink (although some weapons ignore that cover save anyway)
   
Made in us
Hellish Haemonculus






Boskydell, IL

It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.

Welcome to the Freakshow!

(Leadership-shenanigans for Eldar of all types.) 
   
Made in gb
Death-Dealing Devastator




Bournemouth

 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.



Immobilized can Jink still.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
only real restrictions; Heavy and super heavy vehicles can't, super heavy flyers can.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/06/05 22:33:03


WH40K
Iron Wardens 11k (Iron Hands Clan Raukaan with Blood Angels Allies)
Guard PDF 1.5k
Hive Fleet Celesta 3.5k
Irontoof Guttasnarks's Warghband 0k in development 
   
Made in us
Not as Good as a Minion





Astonished of Heck

 Iron_Warden wrote:
 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.

Immobilized can Jink still.

Not with the last rulebook FAQ. If they are Immobilized they completely lose the Jink rule.

Are you a Wolf, a Sheep, or a Hound?
Megavolt wrote:They called me crazy…they called me insane…THEY CALLED ME LOONEY!! and boy, were they right.
 
   
Made in us
Hellish Haemonculus






Boskydell, IL

 Iron_Warden wrote:
 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.



Immobilized can Jink still.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
only real restrictions; Heavy and super heavy vehicles can't, super heavy flyers can.


The BRB did not include a restriction, but the FAQ added a restriction for Immobilized skimmers.

Welcome to the Freakshow!

(Leadership-shenanigans for Eldar of all types.) 
   
Made in au
Hungry Little Ripper





Somewhat on topic, I'm curious:

If a vehicle suffers a crew stunned result, may it jink against further shooting? Don't have my rulebook on me, so I'm not sure if the crew stunned result specifically states you are immobilized for a turn or you just can't move for a turn.
   
Made in gb
Death-Dealing Devastator




Bournemouth

Charistoph wrote:
 Iron_Warden wrote:
 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.

Immobilized can Jink still.

Not with the last rulebook FAQ. If they are Immobilized they completely lose the Jink rule.


I'm looking at the FAQ for the main rulebook atm, no mention of Jink in there. Is it another FAQ you're referring to? (Last updated October 2014)

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/06/05 22:40:42


WH40K
Iron Wardens 11k (Iron Hands Clan Raukaan with Blood Angels Allies)
Guard PDF 1.5k
Hive Fleet Celesta 3.5k
Irontoof Guttasnarks's Warghband 0k in development 
   
Made in au
Hungry Little Ripper





Under page 89, skimmers~

'Skimmers that are not also heavy vehicles or are immobilized have the jink special rule.'

Updated Jan 2015

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/06/05 22:40:53


 
   
Made in us
Hellish Haemonculus






Boskydell, IL

 Iron_Warden wrote:
Charistoph wrote:
 Iron_Warden wrote:
 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.

Immobilized can Jink still.

Not with the last rulebook FAQ. If they are Immobilized they completely lose the Jink rule.


I'm looking at the FAQ for the main rulebook atm, no mention of Jink in there. Is it another FAQ you're referring to?


This one. Second entry under 'Errata.'

Welcome to the Freakshow!

(Leadership-shenanigans for Eldar of all types.) 
   
Made in gb
Death-Dealing Devastator




Bournemouth

oh, wow. Seems i have the wrong link for where the FAQs are... my appologies

WH40K
Iron Wardens 11k (Iron Hands Clan Raukaan with Blood Angels Allies)
Guard PDF 1.5k
Hive Fleet Celesta 3.5k
Irontoof Guttasnarks's Warghband 0k in development 
   
Made in au
Frenzied Berserker Terminator






http://www.games-workshop.com/resources/PDF/Errata/Warhammer_40000/Warhammer_40000_Rules_EN.pdf

Second point in the errata section.

The wording is a little wonky (technically, it doesn't mean what we think it means), but it's be hard to argue that the intention is to only give Jink to Immobilized vehicles...

Edit: wow, ninja'd badly.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/06/05 22:45:39


 
   
Made in br
Fireknife Shas'el




Lisbon, Portugal

 gribblygrrl wrote:
Somewhat on topic, I'm curious:

If a vehicle suffers a crew stunned result, may it jink against further shooting? Don't have my rulebook on me, so I'm not sure if the crew stunned result specifically states you are immobilized for a turn or you just can't move for a turn.


crew stunned just says the vehicle cannot leave its spot/spin. Jink is only prevented if the vehicle is immobilized - which is a very specific condition. cre stunned does not make a vehicle immobilized.

AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union

 Unit1126PLL wrote:
"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"

 Shadenuat wrote:
Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army.
 
   
Made in us
Captain of the Forlorn Hope





Chicago, IL

 gribblygrrl wrote:
Under page 89, skimmers~

'Skimmers that are not also heavy vehicles or are immobilized have the jink special rule.'

Updated Jan 2015


From the looks of this, immobilized vehicles have the jink special rule.

"Did you notice a sign out in front of my chapel that said "Land Raider Storage"?" -High Chaplain Astorath the Grim Redeemer of the Lost.

I sold my soul to the devil and now the bastard is demanding a refund!

We do not have an attorney-client relationship. I am not your lawyer. The statements I make do not constitute legal advice. Any statements made by me are based upon the limited facts you have presented, and under the premise that you will consult with a local attorney. This is not an attempt to solicit business. This disclaimer is in addition to any disclaimers that this website has made.
 
   
Made in us
Loyal Necron Lychguard






Palm Beach, FL

Not is clearly modifying both clauses.
   
Made in nz
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran




Ankh Morpork

Unfortunately "are not also heavy vehicles" and "are immobilised" form two separate verb phrases.

It's poorly written in terms of showing meaning, though I think the intent is clear.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/06/06 05:20:11


 
   
Made in au
[MOD]
Making Stuff






Under the couch

Yeah, there were extensive discussions on this when the FAQ was revised. The wording is terrible, and actualy says the opposite of what it should, but you'll find very few people, if any, who would actually try to take it as written. Most people seem to read it as intended anyway.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/06/06 05:19:17


 
   
Made in lu
Rampaging Khorne Dreadnought






 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.


I'm curious what makes you say it's not a special rule? It's right there in the universal special rule section. Event he rules such as: 'Skimmers that are not also heavy vehicles or are immobilized have the jink special rule.' refer to it as a special rule.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/06/06 13:33:03


 
   
Made in gb
Executing Exarch






Roknar wrote:
 Jimsolo wrote:
It used to be a rule, but is no longer.

Immobilized vehicles still may not Jink, I believe.


I'm curious what makes you say it's not a special rule? It's right there in the universal special rule section. Event he rules such as: 'Skimmers that are not also heavy vehicles or are immobilized have the jink special rule.' refer to it as a special rule.
What Jim meant is that the rule used to be that you had to have moved in the previous turn in order to benefit from Jink (5th Ed.?), but that is no longer the case.
   
Made in lu
Rampaging Khorne Dreadnought






Ah,..duh lol. Makes sense thanks
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: