Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Ensis Ferrae wrote: Ya know... I really hope they aren't trying to pull a "Warma/hordes" kind of move here...
They're trying to copy the success of WMH...only without knowing how to write a balanced set of rules it'll just be a mess.
AS if warmahoards is any more balanced. Walked around adepticon warmahoards room, because i was mildly interested in playing. Let me tell you they are more bloodthristy than 40K professional/semi-professional players. They troll meta list like its pure buisness.
and yes GW is trying to pull off a warmahoards move.
Walks through a bunch of tables playing Warmahordes. Makes wide-sweeping generalizations how it is the same as Warhammer.
