Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Someone on the FLG forums requested players armies be listed alongside the ITC rankings, and it inspired me to play around with the stats a bit in open office...

Here are the results:

Full Size

And if you want the original document (it has some mouse over notes that don't show up in a picture obviously), I attached it to my post on their forum: Here

Obviously not a finished season, but fun to look at I think!

Notes:
The '32' armies in the top 32 is because some people played an equal amount of 2 different armies (i.e Forest Johnson with Eldar/Agents and James Carmona with CSM/Daemons at two a piece)
The total player count is inflated because it is counting people twice if they played more than 1 army (for example, Alex Gonzalez played 1 event as Daemons in addition to his 4 as Necron, so he's counted as two players).
Anyone with the little red square by their faction played at least 1 event as a faction other than the listed one.

Not sure if any of the SM and DA stats are for the new codex yet or not, and I assume Agents of the Imperium cover Skitarii, Admech, Inquisition and IK all?

The FLG guys could probably do something a lot more practical and accurate than this, and the format I used isn't super practical for updates (though it could be worse), but it was fun to make and pour over so even if they do, it wont feel like time wasted

Random thoughts:
A little surprised there aren't any eldar players higher up in the rankings. My initial thought was that perhaps a lot of good players go for more of a challenging army, but then there are 3 necrons in the top 10 and 5 in the top 30....
No BA, DE or IG (ok, AM) in the top 30. A bit surprised considering there's so many more of them than there are SoB or DA (ok, there's not that many DE players either but IG and BA each have more than twice the entries as compared to DA, and almost 3 times as many as SoB).

EDIT: Added some over/underperformance stats to it.

And for funsies:

-----------------------Total----%---In Top 30--%---In Top 10 --%
Imperium of Man 335 -43.73% - 12----37.50%------4-----40%
Xenos/Chaos----- 431 -56.27% -20----62.50%------6-----60%
------------------------766--------------32-------------------10

These rankings include tournaments before the new Eldar/SM/etc. Codexes, right?

Yeah, in fact im not sure it includes any results with the new sm dex at the point i made this.

Any way someone can post top 5 lists?

I think the only ones who could do that would be the FLG guys themselves, and it'd be quite a lot of work for them I imagine. I certainly can't since I just took all the data from their rankings and stuck it into open office and slogged through it (I bet there's some easier way than doing this like with a database program but Idk ).

It's not like people are restricted to running the same list every event either (many of the guys in the top have events played with other factions even).

Awesome stats! Would you be interested in putting this into an article for the FLG front-page?

Thanks I dont have the time at the moment but if that changes I'll let you know!