| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 13:59:14
Subject: a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
Bounding Assault Marine
Leominster
|
OK kids so I have a question .
With the new Marine dex we can now field up to 3 Whirlwinds, Preds, Drews as one FOC choice. My question. Is do said vehicles make a squad or can they operate as individuals once they deploy? I was playing in a tournament last weekend and they said my three Whirlwinds as one heavy support had to shoot the same target since they were a squadron.
|
"I was never a Son of Horus. I was and remain a Luna Wolf. A proud son of Cthonia, a loyal servant of the Emperor."
Recasts are like Fight Cub. No one talks about it, but more people do it then you realize.
Armies.
Luna Wolves 4,000 Points
Thousand Sons 4,000 Points. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 14:06:52
Subject: a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
Resolute Ultramarine Honor Guard
|
The tournament was correct. They are a squadron, and thus must shoot the same target.
|
warboss wrote:Is there a permanent stickied thread for Chaos players to complain every time someone/anyone gets models or rules besides them? If not, there should be. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 14:10:39
Subject: Re:a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
Executing Exarch
|
The SM codex lets you take tanks in Vehicle Squadrons (which is a single unit, albeit with a larger coherency allowance), but they are different to things like Imperial Guard Platoons (which is a single FOC choice containing several separate units).
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 14:35:06
Subject: a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
Usually, each FOC choice is a single entity, made up of multiple models, whether a unit or squadron.
So, those 3 Whirlwinds will make mincemeat of a target, but only the 1 target.
Look at the formation or codex entry for 1 unit/squadron of xxxx, or 1+ of xxxx.
It is the same as IG and others have done for a long time.
Which leads to, when does the Multiple Barrage rule come in?
If the squadron fires a barrage shot per model, don't the 2nd and 3rd shots arrange around the first?
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/07/03 14:36:34
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 15:32:17
Subject: a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Skinnereal wrote:
Which leads to, when does the Multiple Barrage rule come in?
If the squadron fires a barrage shot per model, don't the 2nd and 3rd shots arrange around the first?
That's how I read it.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 15:39:51
Subject: a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
The Last Chancer Who Survived
|
zerosignal wrote: Skinnereal wrote:
Which leads to, when does the Multiple Barrage rule come in?
If the squadron fires a barrage shot per model, don't the 2nd and 3rd shots arrange around the first?
That's how I read it.
Speaking as a Wyvern user, yep.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/03 16:47:39
Subject: Re:a question about SM vehicles
|
 |
Did Fulgrim Just Behead Ferrus?
|
Although, I think GW needs to bring back the old Thudd Gun template and use that (along with the Apocalypse barrage template) to resolve multiple barrages.
|
"Through the darkness of future past, the magician longs to see.
One chants out between two worlds: Fire, walk with me." - Twin Peaks
"You listen to me. While I will admit to a certain cynicism, the fact is that I am a naysayer and hatchetman in the fight against violence. I pride myself in taking a punch and I'll gladly take another because I choose to live my life in the company of Gandhi and King. My concerns are global. I reject absolutely revenge, aggression, and retaliation. The foundation of such a method... is love. I love you Sheriff Truman." - Twin Peaks |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|