Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 08:24:53
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Guarded Grey Knight Terminator
|
I haven't had the chance to play a game in a while. But I know when the necrons came out, necrons were the new hotness with their power creep. Now that a few other armies have gotten a power bump, how are the necrons fairing against the other new armies?
I ask because before the new necron codex dropped and I was thinking about getting necrons, but they were becoming so unpopular so quickly that I decided to hold off to see how the next few releases went. I am not a power gamer, but I don't like walking into my flgs on game night and have no one want to play with me =/
|
"Glory in our suffering, because we know that suffering produces perseverance; perseverance, character; and character, hope. And hope does not disappoint"
-Paul of Tarsus
If my post seems goofy, assume I am posting from my phone and the autocorrect elf in my phone is drunk again |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 10:02:00
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Morphing Obliterator
|
You'll probably be better at getting pick-up games than Eldar players or Space Marine players running the Skyhammer formation. That doesn't say much, though.
|
See, you're trying to use people logic. DM uses Mandelogic, which we've established has 2+2=quack. - Aerethan
Putin.....would make a Vulcan Intelligence officer cry. - Jihadin
AFAIK, there is only one world, and it is the real world. - Iron_Captain
DakkaRank Comment: I sound like a Power Ranger.
TFOL and proud. Also a Forge World Fan.
I should really paint some of my models instead of browsing forums. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 14:29:47
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
I think they are quite balanced with the other new dexs. You'll do better against eldar or new marines than any codex older than necrons.
|
Down with Allies, Solo 2016! |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 14:39:57
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Fighter Pilot
|
-Shrike- wrote:You'll probably be better at getting pick-up games than Eldar players or Space Marine players running the Skyhammer formation. That doesn't say much, though. 
I've never had any major issues with the Skyhammer formation. But then, I run the Devs with multimeltas instead of grav-spamming most of the time.
|
When the only tool you have is a Skyhammer, every army begins to resemble a nail. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 22:20:06
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Slashing Veteran Sword Bretheren
|
Necrons who arent running the decurion arent overpowered, to be honest. Croissant spam is gone, or at least it is quite a bit costlier now.
Eldar are overpowered even without the warhost.
Smurfs (as long as they dont do any stupid allies shenanigans including transport hopping) are still relatively the same power level as before without the formation. With formation I cannot say as I havent played them that way.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/07/11 22:20:50
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 22:37:37
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Shadowy Grot Kommittee Memba
|
As with all things GW overshoots the first time they try it to make it stick.
You saw it with the first flyers in 6th (croissant and valk/vendetta) and with the first decurion (uuuhhhhhh I guess well just increase the durability of the bread and butter units of this codex by 18%-50%? That'll be fine right?) let's try super sizing an existing unit to get people to accept Superheavies. Let's see we'll make everything strength D and add like 30 points to the cost. but the more recent ones have been tamer.
SMs get to field 250 points of free transports for a very mediocre block of units as tax. Eldar move a wee bit faster, they're honestly stronger out of dec.
|
"Got you, Yugi! Your Rubric Marines can't fall back because I have declared the tertiary kaptaris ka'tah stance two, after the secondary dacatarai ka'tah last turn!"
"So you think, Kaiba! I declared my Thousand Sons the cult of Duplicity, which means all my psykers have access to the Sorcerous Facade power! Furthermore I will spend 8 Cabal Points to invoke Cabbalistic Focus, causing the rubrics to appear behind your custodes! The Vengeance for the Wronged and Sorcerous Fullisade stratagems along with the Malefic Maelstrom infernal pact evoked earlier in the command phase allows me to double their firepower, letting me wound on 2s and 3s!"
"you think it is you who has gotten me, yugi, but it is I who have gotten you! I declare the ever-vigilant stratagem to attack your rubrics with my custodes' ranged weapons, which with the new codex are now DAMAGE 2!!"
"...which leads you straight into my trap, Kaiba, you see I now declare the stratagem Implacable Automata, reducing all damage from your attacks by 1 and triggering my All is Dust special rule!" |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 22:40:35
Subject: necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Screaming Shining Spear
|
Sir Arun wrote:Necrons who arent running the decurion arent overpowered, to be honest. Croissant spam is gone, or at least it is quite a bit costlier now.
Eldar are overpowered even without the warhost.
Smurfs (as long as they dont do any stupid allies shenanigans including transport hopping) are still relatively the same power level as before without the formation. With formation I cannot say as I havent played them that way.
The Decurion itself isn't overpowered, it's the Canoptek Harvest and Destroyer Cult+Triarch Stalker that are overpowered. Wraiths are also undercosted.
Eldar have OP and broken units (Wraithknight, D-Weapons, Scatbikers) but the Warhost and associated formations are the least OP thing in the Eldar codex.
Skyhammer and Double Gladius are powerful, but hardly OP or unbeatable. The internet just freaked out over them because they don't like change.
If you aren't bringing the most competitive or nastiest list possible, you can still have a decently balanced game against the older codexes.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/07/11 22:42:45
~3000 (Fully Painted)
Coming Soon!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2015/07/11 22:43:43
Subject: Re:necrons vs the other new armies codex
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
as a SM player I'd say they're in a pretty balanced place. their formation structure has some pretty major limits as compared to 'crons so a lotta the flexability to spam the power stuff isn't so great. you'll notice there are no devestator cent formations or bike formations, for example. over all SMs are in a good place but their formation doesn't give em anything digustingly OP (despite the complaints about the free transports, Space Marine transports are some of the least powerful DTs in the game also it requires a full battle company) the Smurfs themselves are in a really good place with the formation set up, as their chapter tactics really enchourages a mix of assault, devestator and tatical marines anyway, and the strike force formation gives them extra doctrine uses. a Ultramarine gladius strike force has 7 uses of doctrines. 3 tatical, 2 devestraor and 2 assault
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
|