Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2015/07/18 01:55:08
Subject: Re:How Would You Improve WH40K? And does it need improving?
Blacksails wrote: I'd rather do away with the distinction between MCs and vehicles as they are now and have a unified system of toughness and saves. Then, you assign either the 'Vehicle' type, or 'MC' type to the unit which would then tell you what weapons are more effective against them (example being a vehicle type would be prone to haywire, but not MCs, likewise poison would be the opposite).
Boom. Simpler for all, easier to balance, and if done correctly, would allow the blending of the 'mechanical' MCs better with the crunch vs. fluff thing they have going on now.
