Switch Theme:

Why Rhino's armour so weak?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Moustache-twirling Princeps





Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry

Rhinos are a single chassis with many uses. IIRC the fluff from when they first appeared, they were tractor chassis, made to work in battle. When your support team is in a different system, you want a transport that can be kicked back into action.

Chimerae were designed to fit a purpose. Forge-worlds can churn them out by the ship-load, and they're as expendable as the troops they carry. The Techpriests and servitors can fix them up if they break.

If your lightly armoured transport is going to get left half-way up the field as you continue on foot, it doesn't have to be protected that well. This is the Rhino. It is to protect the tactical squad as it follows the vanguard that has cleared its way.
But, if you ride a Chimera into battle, trusting in its armour as you use the mounted gun arrays and turret before hiding behind it for cover, you'll want a tough front-end to help you get there.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/08/12 10:39:20


 
Made in gb
Moustache-twirling Princeps





Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry

 Furyou Miko wrote:
Exploration ATVs, not tractors. Do people just not read my posts?
Nope. Missed that one, after reading most of the posts above it.
See the "IIRC" at the start of the post. It also wasn't the main point in my post.
Yours makes more sense, though.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/08/12 12:05:47


 
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: