| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
1970/02/26 00:00:00
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Out of town, and can't the make the comparison from my hotel.
Would he fit behind it completely from a height perspective?
A photo would be awesome.
|
|
|
 |
|
2015/08/12 00:28:25
Subject: Re:Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Foolproof Falcon Pilot
|
While I can't provide a picture of a direct comparison between the two models, I did manage to find pictures of each model compared to a normal sized infantry model.
Bunker size comparison - http://orig12.deviantart.net/5119/f/2012/365/4/9/imperial_bunker_by_spooky777-d5ptlbm.jpg
Fateweaver comparison - https://farm3.staticflickr.com/2933/14078831213_cb9af24a60_b.jpg
From the looks of the pictures, it seems the bunker is about twice as tall as a normal infantry model, perhaps a bit taller. The fateweaver appears to be roughly the same height (taking into account the modified base). It would most likely be possible to hide fateweaver behind the bunker, especially from the perspective of an enemy infantry model.
|
|
|
|
|
2015/08/12 02:47:26
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Fixture of Dakka
|
You can see nearly 40% of Fateweaver over a bunker.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
|
|
2015/08/12 03:12:30
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
Ankh Morpork
|
Should be noted you only have to hide Fateweaver's body, i.e. head, torso, arms and legs. Wings for example are ignored for drawing line of sight to a target.
|
|
|
|
|
2015/08/12 03:50:46
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Automated Rubric Marine of Tzeentch
|
 Mr. Shine wrote:Should be noted you only have to hide Fateweaver's body, i.e. head, torso, arms and legs. Wings for example are ignored for drawing line of sight to a target.
Care to cite rules to back that up?
|
 Let a billion souls burn in death than for one soul to bend knee to a false Emperor.....
"I am the punishment of God, had you not committed great sin, God would not have sent a punishment like me upon you" |
|
|
|
|
2015/08/12 04:02:16
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
Ankh Morpork
|
From 'Line of Sight' within the General Principles section:
"For one model to have line of sight to another, you must be able to trace a straight, unblocked line from its body (the head, torso, arms or legs) to any part of the target's body.
Sometimes all that will be visible of a model is a weapon, banner or some other ornament that he is carrying. In these cases, the model is not visible. Similarly, we ignore wings, tails and antennae even though they are technically part of a model's body."
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/08/12 04:02:40
|
|
|
|
|
2015/08/12 04:02:45
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Deranged Necron Destroyer
|
 quickfuze wrote: Mr. Shine wrote:Should be noted you only have to hide Fateweaver's body, i.e. head, torso, arms and legs. Wings for example are ignored for drawing line of sight to a target.
Care to cite rules to back that up?
I think he is talking about the rule on page 14 in the BRB
"For one model to have line of sight to another, you must be able to trace a straight, unblocked line from its body (the head,torso,arms or legs) to any part of the target's body"
It also says to ignore wings tails antennae even though they are technically part of a model's body.
|
It's easy to assume that people arguing an interpretation you disagree with are just looking for an advantage for themselves... But it's quite often not the case. |
|
|
|
|
2015/08/12 04:07:28
Subject: Height question: Does the imperial bunker block line of sight to Kairos Fateweaver?
|
|
Scarred Ultramarine Tyrannic War Veteran
Ankh Morpork
|
Yeah, from exactly where you'd probably expect it to be if you were to look 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
