Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

- Is Iyanden still a legal supplement?
- Is old Codex: Eldar still legal?
- Is BattleFocus for windriders essentially useless with RAW? Only case it can be usefull is when a non jetbike IC joins, he can keep up qith the bikes by running.
- If a new Tau codex drops, will Farsight Enclaves still be legal?
- For ITC, when do you roll to potentially save vs a Destroyer weapon - before OR after the additional d3/d6 wounds are inflicted?

Yes
No
Yes
Maybe
Don't know how ITC ruled it. Per RAW, it can be read that you either save once per Destroyer hit if able, or you save per generated wound if able. Since the rule is poorly worded, and saves tend to be against wounds rather than hits, the easier argument would be to roll saves per wound generated. However, it would still be a legal argument to roll once per hit to avoid the "exploding" wounds.

SJ

Thanks SJ... I'll PM Reece on the ITC thing.