Switch Theme:

[1500] - Necrons  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Decurion:
Reclamation Legion:
- CCB w/ Voidblade, Gauntlet of the Conflagrator
- 10 Warriors
- 10 Warriors
- 5 Immortals w/ Gauss
- 3 Tomb Blades with 3x Paticle Caster, 2x Nebuloscope, 1x Shadowloom (just killing the last 5 points with these upgrades)
Destroyer Cult:
- Destroyer Lord w/ Voidreaper, Phase Shifter, Phylactery (Warlord)
- 3 Destroyers w/ Heavy Destroyer
- 3 Destroyers w/ Heavy Destroyer
- 3 Destroyers
Canoptek Harvest
- 6 Wraiths w/ Whip Coils
- 3 Scarabs
- Tomb Spyder

The Destroyer Lord probably goes with one of the Warrior squads.

As an alternative, I could replace the CCB with an Overlord with no upgrades, and add in a squad of 5 Deathmarks. The Destroyer Lord could join these and deep strike in with them. Would that be better than the flamer-CCB, do you think?

Any other thoughts or suggestions?

 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in us
Regular Dakkanaut




I think your idea of adding a destroyer lord to a unit of deathmarks is a good one. His preferred enemy will make the unit wound on 2s rerolling on their first turn. After that the lord should probably leave the squad to make use of his formidable close combat potential. To make the most of this tactic, I think you should get rid of 3 of your wraiths and swap your barge lord for a stock overlord. That way you can get a full squad of 10 deathmarks. The wraiths are good, but since they don't have a lot of damage output they're more effective as min squad tarpits. Sadly, the barge lord isn't as good as he used to be, so I think your better off with a stock overlord, especially since the destroyer lord is your warlord.
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

I'd keep the CCB. It can be a real wrecking machine.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





UK

I'd personally go Deathmarks and Overlord. A lone CCB is going to be the target of all your opponents AT

YMDC = nightmare 
   
Made in gb
Killer Klaivex




The dark behind the eyes.

Thanks for the replies.

Anrakyr-the-Traveller wrote:
I think your idea of adding a destroyer lord to a unit of deathmarks is a good one. His preferred enemy will make the unit wound on 2s rerolling on their first turn. After that the lord should probably leave the squad to make use of his formidable close combat potential. To make the most of this tactic, I think you should get rid of 3 of your wraiths and swap your barge lord for a stock overlord. That way you can get a full squad of 10 deathmarks. The wraiths are good, but since they don't have a lot of damage output they're more effective as min squad tarpits. Sadly, the barge lord isn't as good as he used to be, so I think your better off with a stock overlord, especially since the destroyer lord is your warlord.


Do you really think it's worth sacrificing half the Wraith squad for 5 extra deathmarks?

I mean, the Wraiths are pretty damn useful, and when I'm paying a tax to field them I have to wonder if it's worth it just for a minimum squad.

If I went down that route, might it be better to scrap the wraiths entirely and replace them with something else?

 wuestenfux wrote:
I'd keep the CCB. It can be a real wrecking machine.


Well, the S7 AP2 flamer is certainly nice, but I rarely see it doing much outside of that.

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/09/08 10:11:05


 blood reaper wrote:
I will respect human rights and trans people but I will never under any circumstances use the phrase 'folks' or 'ya'll'. I would rather be killed by firing squad.



 the_scotsman wrote:
Yeah, when i read the small novel that is the Death Guard unit options and think about resolving the attacks from a melee-oriented min size death guard squad, the thing that springs to mind is "Accessible!"

 Argive wrote:
GW seems to have a crystal ball and just pulls hairbrained ideas out of their backside for the most part.


 Andilus Greatsword wrote:

"Prepare to open fire at that towering Wraithknight!"
"ARE YOU DAFT MAN!?! YOU MIGHT HIT THE MEN WHO COME UP TO ITS ANKLES!!!"


Akiasura wrote:
I hate to sound like a serial killer, but I'll be reaching for my friend occam's razor yet again.


 insaniak wrote:

You're not. If you're worried about your opponent using 'fake' rules, you're having fun the wrong way. This hobby isn't about rules. It's about buying Citadel miniatures.

Please report to your nearest GW store for attitude readjustment. Take your wallet.
 
   
Made in gb
Tail-spinning Tomb Blade Pilot




 vipoid wrote:

Do you really think it's worth sacrificing half the Wraith squad for 5 extra deathmarks?

I mean, the Wraiths are pretty damn useful, and when I'm paying a tax to field them I have to wonder if it's worth it just for a minimum squad.

If I went down that route, might it be better to scrap the wraiths entirely and replace them with something else?



I do.

3 wraiths more won't add much killingness for 120 points.

Look if we only ha d a CAD and no decurion wraiths would be so hard but I'm not sure they would get taken. There are just so many better things in there. With 4+ RP wraiths become super and just able to meet the level of lychguard, flayed ones, etc in close combat. I don't think they are near a Judicator Bn or cult (admittedly fewer points).

15k+
3k+
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K Army Lists
Go to: