Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Hi does anyone know in what UK white dwarf I can find the "CHAOTICIANS AND CATACLYSMS RADICAL MEASURES IN WARHAMMER 40,000 by Phil Kelly" Article ?
It contained artifacts for radical inquisitors and relictors. I'm trying to find it in oder to know what white dwarf I should buy, but I can only find a refence to a US WD and I'm not even sure if it is the correct one since lexicanum of that issue doesn't mention the article.

this is what I have found so far

http://diamedes-archive.blogspot.nl/2007/08/chaoticians-and-cataclysms.html

http://redelf.narod.ru/w40k/ia/w40k_ia_relic_0.html

http://www.belloflostsouls.net/2010/03/40k-playtest-radical-wargear.html

There are some US WD numbers mentioned in here but I'm unsure if they are correct nor how to translate them correctly to UK issues

http://mkerrchainfist.blogspot.nl/2009/10/chain-mail-relictors.html

Since I can't seem to find the article in the list of articles in that white dwarf posted on lexicanum
http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/White_Dwarf_287_%28US%29

281 has the rules for Relictors.
Leads me to believe that UK issues are +1.
Unfortunately I have a gap in my collection at 287 288.

Thx that helped a lot

I ordered that white dwarf and took a gamble on the one containing the artefacts.

Good stuff. Let us know of the +1 theory works. I'm sure that there must be a cutoff/crossover somewhere.

The US/UK mismatch is indeed annoying, and it is a +1, the UK version being 1 number higher than US, but the releases are not always identical even when the gap is considered (one can have content the other does not)

Them relictor rules are awfully out of date though. not even function considering half the content referenced does not exist any more.

 BoomWolf wrote:
but the releases are not always identical even when the gap is considered (one can have content the other does not)

Quoted For Truth.

This is the most glaring example I know of, the US WD had the relics in the same issue as the Index Astartes article, the UK WD didn't print them until over a year later, in the same issue as the Extremis Diabolus story which was never printed in the US, this caused something of a rift between Relictor aficionados on either side of the pond: Some American players rejected the Extremis Diabolus story as non-canon whilst the Brits generally accepted it because they wanted to use the accompanying rules.

It was White Dwarf 295 I believe:
http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/wiki/White_Dwarf_295_(UK)