| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2015/12/14 23:59:00
Subject: Which army has the more viable 'competitive, builds?
|
|
Stealthy Space Wolves Scout
|
Between Daemons and Dark Eldar
I love the dark elders Null deployment/ rapid assault feel but I hate how they're overshadowed by craftworlds
I pretty much love every God in chaos, so collecting every model in daemons wouldn't be hard
But why army has the most viable lists / tactics???
|
|
|
 |
|
2015/12/15 00:06:34
Subject: Which army has the more viable 'competitive, builds?
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Daemons
Dark Eldar have VERY limited builds to make them effective, and end up being a tax to get Raiders for your Aspect Warriors.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
 jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
 vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
 MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever.
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/15 00:10:37
Subject: Which army has the more viable 'competitive, builds?
|
|
Tunneling Trygon
|
Agreed, Daemons win out without question. Dark Eldar are so limited in the current Meta, though I haven't seen them play against MSU yet, only get slaughtered by Str 6 Spam or other big builds. Daemons though have options that allow them to tailor their games AFTER deployment and seeing your opponent's army. That's a significant advantage being able to bring the appropriate models to the table whenever you like and on the fly.
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/15 00:20:50
Subject: Which army has the more viable 'competitive, builds?
|
|
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
What's left of Cadia
|
Demons probably, DE really have no viable competitive builds as far as I'm aware, most of the time they're taken as an allied detachment tax for Craftworld Eldar
|
TheEyeOfNight- I swear, this thread is 70% smack talk, 20% RP organization, and 10% butt jokes
TheEyeOfNight- "Ordo Xenos reports that the Necrons have attained democracy, kamikaze tendencies, and nuclear fission. It's all tits up, sir."
Space Marine flyers are shaped for the greatest possible air resistance so that the air may never defeat the SPACE MARINES!
Sternguard though, those guys are all about kicking ass. They'd chew bubble gum as well, but bubble gum is heretical. Only tau chew gum
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/15 02:54:02
Subject: Re:Which army has the more viable 'competitive, builds?
|
|
Hellish Haemonculus
|
I think people are being a little harsh on Dark Eldar.
That being said, I also think Daemons is the more versatile codex, and has more competitive builds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/15 05:16:31
Subject: Which army has the more viable 'competitive, builds?
|
|
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
Daemons are actually one of the top armies in the game right now. They just require a lot more finesse to to compete with the other top tier armies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
