| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2015/12/18 22:21:14
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Do we need a area for betrayal at calth; I'm enjoying the game and a waiting to see the homebrew scenarios and units and sundry ect
At present I am not sure where to post or look? Boardgames or 40k?
|
'an open mind is like a fortress with its gate unbarred.' |
|
|
 |
|
2015/12/19 00:39:57
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Board games forum seems appropriate.
|
DA:70S+G+M+B++I++Pw40k08+D++A++/fWD-R+T(M)DM+
 |
|
|
|
|
2015/12/19 02:50:41
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
[DCM]
.
|
You can probably sneak it into the [30K] Subforum too...
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/19 16:05:03
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
Rotting Sorcerer of Nurgle
|
You know... On that topic, would GW specialist and unsupported games still need the unsupported part because GW is picking them back up?
|
H.B.M.C.- The end hath come! From now on armies will only consist of Astorath, Land Speeder Storms and Soul Grinders!
War Kitten- Vanden, you just taunted the Dank Lord Ezra. Prepare for seven years of fighting reality...
koooaei- Emperor: I envy your nipplehorns. <Magnus goes red. Permanently>
Neronoxx- If our Dreadnought doesn't have sick scuplted abs, we riot.
Frazzled- I don't generally call anyone by a term other than "sir" "maam" "youn g lady" "young man" or " HEY  bag!"
Ruin- It's official, we've ran out of things to talk about on Dakka. Close the site. We're done.
mrhappyface- "They're more what you'd call guidlines than actual rules" - Captain Roboute Barbosa
Steve steveson- To be clear, I'd sell you all out for a bottle of scotch and a mid priced hooker.
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/19 16:29:16
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I'm just scared to post about calth in the 30k forum cos it's not 'proper' 30k!! I need to man up!
I'm hoping that there is a group of people out there who will be sharing and creating scenario's and maybe floor plans ect
Boardgames just doesn't seem right nor does specialist games in my mind
|
'an open mind is like a fortress with its gate unbarred.' |
|
|
|
|
2015/12/19 16:52:10
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
[MOD]
Decrepit Dakkanaut
Cozy cockpit of an Archer ARC-5S
|
Betrayal at Calth is proper 30k and all that. Just start a topic already and get the ball rolling. 
|
Fatum Iustum Stultorum
Fiat justitia ruat caelum
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/20 22:34:13
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
Thunderhawk Pilot Dropping From Orbit
|
 Tactical_Spam wrote:You know... On that topic, would GW specialist and unsupported games still need the unsupported part because GW is picking them back up?
Unsupported is a valid inclusion until such time as *every* OOP GW game is back in print under the Specialist Games division. Which will be never btw, it's unlikely for example that GW will ever resurrect both Man'o'War *and* Dreadfleet for example.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/20 22:52:40
|
|
|
|
|
2015/12/20 22:58:59
Subject: betrayal at calth
|
|
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
 Gashrog wrote: Tactical_Spam wrote:You know... On that topic, would GW specialist and unsupported games still need the unsupported part because GW is picking them back up?
Unsupported is a valid inclusion until such time as *every* OOP GW game is back in print under the Specialist Games division. Which will be never btw, it's unlikely for example that GW will ever resurrect both Man'o'War *and* Dreadfleet for example.
In that case we should probably shut down 40K and include unsupported as well until *every* edition of 40K is back in print and we get a Squat Codex... 
But yeah, that section will have an interesting mix of new and supported, as well as old and unsupported, games. I don't think the traffic would be there to separate them into two sub-forums, so it's probably best to keep them together.
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/20 23:01:06
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
