Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
2015/12/29 14:45:57
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
This is something I am always curious about and surprisingly can never find online. Has anyone seen or even played a good 'Counts -As' army?
Specifically, I mean using models (usually heavily converted) from one army, yet the rules for another. An obvious example of this is using Chaos Marine models, but with a specific theme in mind, you can use Loyalist Marine rules. Like using Blood Angle rules to represent a Berserker Army.
Another (I think more creative example) is using Khorne Skullcrusher/Bloodcrusher models using Thunderwolf Cav rules.
I have also seen an entire Ork "Grot" army using tons of tanks using the Imperial Guard rules. It was beautifully painted too.
--------------
I love the creativity involved in this, but it has been my experience that it can sometimes be met with criticism. I have tried several times to do something like this. My most succeddful try was this: http://glennsgwmodels.blogspot.com/2014/02/wraith-construct-tau-allies.html
More recently I am attempting to add a "Grey Knight" nemesis detachment to my Eldar (painted in the scheme of the rest of my army), in which I have Wraithlords on Vyper jetbikes as DreadKnights and a units of WraithGaurd-like constructs to be a unit of Terminators with Librarian (mini-WraithSeer). I love the fact that the Nemesis Strike force rules can seem like using modified Webway portals and it even gives a 1-turn "Battle Focus". I also like that the DK's personal teleporter gives a 1-turn turbo-boost to my jetbike riding Wraithlords.
Fluffwise, I want this detachment to be a sort of specialized anti-daemon Wraith-construct group to add to my Eldar CAD. I would have no other Wraith units beside a Wraith Knight, to avoid confusion.
---------------
So has anyone else played with or seen any other really good "counts as" armies?
--
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/12/29 14:52:33
All of my inquisition models are heavy conversions usually involving lots of fantasy model bits.
I do have count as / scratch build ork vehicles, and I go totally nuts on the creation of my own daemons out of sculpting clay and lots of spare bits.
I have never heard any opposition to these armies. But I should mention that I do try to keep in the "feel" of the models, art or fluff.
Even with those daemons I try to get them fit in the theme of the other daemons in my army. For example all my tzeentch daemons have some bird features, have roughly the same size and are painted in the same colours as the regular ones. Just gluing a weapon of race a to a body of race b and using them as race A is something I would never consider. If I do have to explain what something is more then once during the game or if it takes some time for my opponent to digest my " this counts as that" talk I consider it a failure and will not be fielding that model again.
This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2015/12/29 15:13:39
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while
2015/12/29 15:14:17
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
I saw a vampire counts army converted to AM; it was awesome.
Six mistakes mankind keeps making century after century: Believing that personal gain is made by crushing others; Worrying about things that cannot be changed or corrected; Insisting that a thing is impossible because we cannot accomplish it; Refusing to set aside trivial preferences; Neglecting development and refinement of the mind; Attempting to compel others to believe and live as we do
2015/12/29 15:49:20
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
I use FW mechanicum models with the 40k skiitari/cult Mechanicus rules
People are more comfortable with the 40k ruleset, and I'm not gonna complain about being handed free power.
"Got you, Yugi! Your Rubric Marines can't fall back because I have declared the tertiary kaptaris ka'tah stance two, after the secondary dacatarai ka'tah last turn!"
"So you think, Kaiba! I declared my Thousand Sons the cult of Duplicity, which means all my psykers have access to the Sorcerous Facade power! Furthermore I will spend 8 Cabal Points to invoke Cabbalistic Focus, causing the rubrics to appear behind your custodes! The Vengeance for the Wronged and Sorcerous Fullisade stratagems along with the Malefic Maelstrom infernal pact evoked earlier in the command phase allows me to double their firepower, letting me wound on 2s and 3s!"
"you think it is you who has gotten me, yugi, but it is I who have gotten you! I declare the ever-vigilant stratagem to attack your rubrics with my custodes' ranged weapons, which with the new codex are now DAMAGE 2!!"
"...which leads you straight into my trap, Kaiba, you see I now declare the stratagem Implacable Automata, reducing all damage from your attacks by 1 and triggering my All is Dust special rule!"
2015/12/29 16:11:32
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
I've been using my 2nd Ed LotD army as every variation of Marine army since 3rd, always WYSIWYG. No one ever minds.
SJ
“For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world.”
- Ephesians 6:12
2015/12/29 19:15:15
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
all eldar exodite armies are counts as, usually as CW elder or sometimes dark elder. I have been researching using counts as nids for them and seen some really nice conversion armies doing that online.
2015/12/29 19:28:52
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
wolf13 wrote: all eldar exodite armies are counts as, usually as CW elder or sometimes dark elder. I have been researching using counts as nids for them and seen some really nice conversion armies doing that online.
Oh, good example. I don't know why that one slipped my mind. I have seen some AMAZING Exodite armies using lizardmen models. The Dark Elf Cold One Knights are also a great kit to make some dragon riders.
wolf13 wrote: all eldar exodite armies are counts as, usually as CW elder or sometimes dark elder. I have been researching using counts as nids for them and seen some really nice conversion armies doing that online.
Oh, good example. I don't know why that one slipped my mind. I have seen some AMAZING Exodite armies using lizardmen models. The Dark Elf Cold One Knights are also a great kit to make some dragon riders.
Theres so many different options with Exodites. I am hoping the Raging Hero's new minis will make a good exodite core (fell in love with the stingray riders), which is why I have been researching the Nid counts as. I already have elder, working on corsairs and harlequins and some DE so need a way to make them truly different in play.
I like your idea of a nemesis detachment after thinking on it. I had thought about doing GK's sometime as an ally, but never really had a solid idea on where to go with it. Gives me some new thoughts.
2015/12/29 23:08:03
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
i second the nod to the ork grey knights. kudos dude!
i play a lot of counts as in my "tzeentch" daemon army. i have converted my own versions of "tzeentchy drones", "tzeentch warrior daemons", what have you. as long as you find a ruleset that fits, who cares?
40K: | |
2015/12/31 03:42:28
Subject: Re:How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
I use a number of "Exodites" in my Eldar armies. (Wild Riders/Sisters of the Thorn subbing in for Eldar Jetbikes.)
Never had any complaints until the new codex dropped, then I started hearing a lot of bitching while setting up games. Once I told them I wasn't running the bikes with scatter lasers or Shuriken cannons, the response was universally, "Oh. Well, that's alright then."
(I forgot, I also have a Treeman who serves as my Wraithseer whenever I want to field one.)
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2015/12/31 03:43:18
I guess I have a count as army with my Traitor guard. I use various models to make up the troops like Chaos Cultists, the Forge world Renegade and Heretics, Chaos Marauders and other various chaosy bits. But i use the astra militarum codex for the rules mostly because it fits my play style a bit more.
I also use Renegade Ogryns as count as for Chaos Spawn in my Khorne Daemonkin, that was mostly for aesthetics
At Nova 2011, I met a guy that played a Skaven army using "Counts As Dark Eldar" rules. It was called the Kabal of the Fursaken; pics can be found on http://teninchtemplate.blogspot.com
2016/01/01 03:57:44
Subject: How many of you have seen/played succesful "Counts-As" armies?
I've had a few ideas but rarely the capital to get the necessary parts.
One of the Armies I really wanna make is a mounted Khornate army, with Chaos Knights being Wolf Guard Bikers and Bloodcrushers being Thunderwolves. Unfortunately that is exceedingly expensive to start on a whim (at least in canada).
Another one I wanna do is an entire Exodite biker army using Wood Elf Wild Riders (because badass reindeers).
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do.