Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/17 19:11:03
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Angelic Adepta Sororitas
earth
|
I'm going to buy a used astra militarum army and it comes in the lot with the 5 old school ogryns.
They any good? the models be sexy tho.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/17 19:17:48
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
If you thought I hated Mutilators, I hate Ogryns even more.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/17 19:28:55
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Ogryns (and bullgryn) are the case of a good unit that fill a niche necessary in the Imperial guard force, but the fact that their weapons aren`t affected by first rank fire second rank fire and their terrible pricing (seriously they should be aroun 28 pts not 40) makes them a very poor choice. Shame since they are indeed very cool both in fluff and model.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/17 19:33:21
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
What's left of Cadia
|
Ogryns and Bullgryns aren't that bad. It's just that they're overcosted for what they do.
|
TheEyeOfNight- I swear, this thread is 70% smack talk, 20% RP organization, and 10% butt jokes
TheEyeOfNight- "Ordo Xenos reports that the Necrons have attained democracy, kamikaze tendencies, and nuclear fission. It's all tits up, sir."
Space Marine flyers are shaped for the greatest possible air resistance so that the air may never defeat the SPACE MARINES!
Sternguard though, those guys are all about kicking ass. They'd chew bubble gum as well, but bubble gum is heretical. Only tau chew gum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/17 20:23:11
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
!!Goffik Rocker!!
|
It'd be interesting to see someone making them work, right?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/17 20:35:12
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
epronovost wrote:Ogryns (and bullgryn) are the case of a good unit that fill a niche necessary in the Imperial guard force, but the fact that their weapons aren`t affected by first rank fire second rank fire and their terrible pricing (seriously they should be aroun 28 pts not 40) makes them a very poor choice. Shame since they are indeed very cool both in fluff and model.
Bullgryn are kinda fun if you throw "Suppressive Fire!" or "Forwards, for the Emperor!" on them.
Otherwise you're absolutely right. Waaaaaay overpriced for what they are. It's a relic of 2nd/3rd edition IMO.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 02:33:35
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Angelic Adepta Sororitas
earth
|
So the only real problem they have is their point cost. All in all, the unit itself is quite good and fills a niche, but the only real issue here is point cost?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 02:45:47
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
drunken0elf wrote:So the only real problem they have is their point cost. All in all, the unit itself is quite good and fills a niche, but the only real issue here is point cost?
I would say so, but point cost is everything.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 02:47:31
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Ollanius Pius - Savior of the Emperor
Gathering the Informations.
|
drunken0elf wrote:So the only real problem they have is their point cost. All in all, the unit itself is quite good and fills a niche, but the only real issue here is point cost?
Their weapons and durability are also issues.
But points cost is the biggest, effectively relegating them to "wouldn't it be cool..." status.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 03:39:22
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Imperial Guard Landspeeder Pilot
On moon miranda.
|
War Kitten wrote:Ogryns and Bullgryns aren't that bad. It's just that they're overcosted for what they do.
They're *massively* overcosted, and then they have the Ld issue to contend with, the low LD means they *must* be babysat or they're going to run away, which really does make them pretty bad for a unit that's supposed to fill the role that they do.
|
IRON WITHIN, IRON WITHOUT.
New Heavy Gear Log! Also...Grey Knights!
The correct pronunciation is Imperial Guard and Stormtroopers, "Astra Militarum" and "Tempestus Scions" are something you'll find at Hogwarts. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 03:46:36
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Ultramarine Master with Gauntlets of Macragge
What's left of Cadia
|
Vaktathi wrote: War Kitten wrote:Ogryns and Bullgryns aren't that bad. It's just that they're overcosted for what they do.
They're *massively* overcosted, and then they have the Ld issue to contend with, the low LD means they *must* be babysat or they're going to run away, which really does make them pretty bad for a unit that's supposed to fill the role that they do.
I can't disagree. I would love to use Ogryns or Bullgryns as an means to counter-charge and tarpit some of my opponent's nasty units, but LD 7 sucks. They pretty much need a priest babysitter just to keep em' in combat.
|
TheEyeOfNight- I swear, this thread is 70% smack talk, 20% RP organization, and 10% butt jokes
TheEyeOfNight- "Ordo Xenos reports that the Necrons have attained democracy, kamikaze tendencies, and nuclear fission. It's all tits up, sir."
Space Marine flyers are shaped for the greatest possible air resistance so that the air may never defeat the SPACE MARINES!
Sternguard though, those guys are all about kicking ass. They'd chew bubble gum as well, but bubble gum is heretical. Only tau chew gum
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 04:23:35
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
Ogryns are one of those units I have always wanted to field but never do. As Vak mentioned, they are massively overpriced points wise for what they offer & their low leadership means you have to add even more points into either a commissar or what have you to babysit them.
Literally half the posters on this site are more qualified than whomever is making the rules for these units at GW. Every single codex update they make the same mistakes over & over, then wonder why certain models don't sell well.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 04:26:35
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Run them for fun, but don't expect much out of them. There's a reason that "Ogryn Syndrome" is named after them (that is, a model that has pretty good stats for assault and multi-wound, but lacks actual good CC weapons and are overcosted, thus means that they die to ID too fast and don't actually do much better than single-wound assault-oriented squads).
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 04:45:14
Subject: Re:Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Other problem is IG doesn't have a good delivery system for them.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 05:12:26
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Well if you're willing to go Forge World, I'd imagine a Gorgon would be a good transport.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 05:51:14
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Decrepit Dakkanaut
|
Bullgryns are basically everything you wanted out of Ogyrns, but much more.
|
CaptainStabby wrote:If Tyberos falls and needs to catch himself it's because the ground needed killing.
jy2 wrote:BTW, I can't wait to run Double-D-thirsters! Man, just thinking about it gets me Khorney.
vipoid wrote:Indeed - what sort of bastard would want to use their codex?
MarsNZ wrote:ITT: SoB players upset that they're receiving the same condescending treatment that they've doled out in every CSM thread ever. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 06:17:04
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Mekboy Hammerin' Somethin'
|
The only real time that I'd imagine ogryns being worth the points would be in a very large game where you wouldn't feel their points lost. Something like a wall of bullgryns behind an Aegis line blocking some tanks (either a parking lot or a few baneblades) with camo netting. 2+ cover saves would be pretty nifty.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 13:57:54
Subject: Re:Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Worthiest of Warlock Engineers
|
Ogryns and Bullgryns both suffer from being too pricey for what they do whilst lacking key pieces of equipment and stats. Compare them too something like, say, Centurions which are essentially the C:SM equivalent. Centurions cost 55 points per model, have 1 wound less but have a far better save, two, usually heavy, weapons that are usually twin linked, can fire both these weapons in the shooting phase, have relentless, have a far longer engagement envelope and are far better in assault.
Oh and they have far better BS, I and LD.
Saying this I did have some brief success with using a unit of six Ogryns. They gave my opponent a nasty surprise and when used in an extremely limited field (IE separated from the rest of the battle by terrain, with infantry and armour support and against only a couple of MEQ squads) they proved to be lethal. My opponents had a few tough moments dealing with them.
Then one of my opponents turned up with Primarch Angron and they where completely invalidated.
Oh and a single Eversor Assassin can kill around 8.33' off in a single assault phase before the Ogryns can even strike back.I know because one of my opponents once charged a ten Ogryn unit with his Eversor and there where enough left over wounds to kill another two and a bit.
|
Free from GW's tyranny and the hobby is looking better for it
DR:90-S++G+++M++B++I+Pww205++D++A+++/sWD146R++T(T)D+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/18 14:45:52
Subject: Ogryns anygood?
|
 |
Shas'la with Pulse Carbine
|
Are ogryns or bullgryns competitive, no.
are they points effecient, no.
Can they do surprising things, like 4+ cover in the open Leman Russes yes (bullgryns with slab shields give anything behind them +1 better coversave than normal, 5+ for intervening model, 4+ for bullgryn, 3+ for camo net) so you vehicles can get a save for once. and if they are base to base they are 3+ armor, not totally ignored. And if they ignore your bullgryns (because there is a dangerous tank behind them) while you move forward with russ following, they punch really hard.
but they aren't good
|
|
 |
 |
|