| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 06:37:57
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
How do you feel about using Alternate models to represent things in your army?
Here's an example: Lets say you're were playing Daemons and they wanted to go full Slaaneshi theme, but decided they just really needed Plague Drones, so They modded up some Seekers with wings for their Plague Drone squad and put them on flying bases instead of the normal Seeker Base.
OR if some guy just really liked the Warrior Priest Model from AoS, so he did a little bit a tweaking on it to represent Power Armor and stuck a holstered bolt pistol on his hip to use as the Chapter Master and kitbashed up 5 of the Sigmarites to look the part for his Honor Guard/ Command Squad.
Would you be ok with playing against these guys?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 07:15:09
Subject: Re:Using Alternate models
|
 |
Latest Wrack in the Pits
Spokane, WA
|
Would not be an issue at all, as long as what the model is makes sense. So your examples are perfectly okay. But using Night Goblins for permanent space marine stand ins? Nope. Creativity is generally rewarded with praise in this game community, unless they are TFG
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 07:17:29
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Lord of the Fleet
|
As long as it's clear what they're supposed to be and they aren't confusingly similar to something else its generally fine.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 07:18:59
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Nothing wrong with it. Keeps the game interesting as long as you can tell what it's meant to be.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 08:39:23
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Krazy Grot Kutta Driva
|
I do this a lot with models because I like to run something unique. Have yet to have anyone really complain, just make sure you go over the list with them in the beginning and make the conversions make sense
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 08:59:08
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Frenzied Berserker Terminator
|
I have plans to use Lokhir Fellheart as a DE Archon, because he's cool and the new Archon model sucks - the pose is just weird.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 09:43:13
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Ancient Venerable Dark Angels Dreadnought
|
As long as it's clear what it's supposed to be, relatively similar in size (so I don't feel bad about potentially cheesing LOS or you cheesing it), and isn't something ridiculous, but serious.
|
“There is only one good, knowledge, and one evil, ignorance.” |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 13:36:15
Subject: Re:Using Alternate models
|
 |
Worthiest of Warlock Engineers
|
I use Bolt Action stuff for my Guard army. It is cheaper and the models look really good.
|
Free from GW's tyranny and the hobby is looking better for it
DR:90-S++G+++M++B++I+Pww205++D++A+++/sWD146R++T(T)D+
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 14:05:52
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
People use old Squat models with the Ork codex, and here's hardly any whinging about that.
Rule of Cool and WYSIWYG usually win over most objections.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 14:08:08
Subject: Re:Using Alternate models
|
 |
Pulsating Possessed Chaos Marine
|
If the model reasonably looks like what it's meant to represent, then I'll never have an issue with it.
Examples: an elf model (from whatever range) with the appropiate gear & paint scheme representing an eldar/dark eldar is cool. A historical tank representing a Leman Russ is cool (as long as the overall size is similar). Unmodified human soldiers carrying auto or lasrifles as Imperial Guardsmen: cool.
Ultimate example: an empty deodorant can, properly converted and painted, achieving a similar size to whatever vehicle is meant to represent: extremely cool.
Almost everybody knows an anecdote about facing some GW lobotomite who blatantly refused to play against alternate models and/or conversions because such a thing would have gone against the unshakable foundations of The Hobby(tm), but I think most people will be ok with alternate models and conversions as long as they resonably look what they're meant to represent and some decent effort can be seen on them.
This hobby should be about enjoying yourself while letting your imagination fly, not grumbling about why that converted model is half a milimetre too short to be a 'proper' space marine.
|
Progress is like a herd of pigs: everybody is interested in the produced benefits, but nobody wants to deal with all the resulting gak.
GW customers deserve every bit of outrageous princing they get. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 14:37:54
Subject: Using Alternate models
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Always Rule of Cool.
But I would try to make any such models to at least look like good approximations. Like using Skullcrushers of Khorne or Empire Demigryphs as TWC. That would be good. Using Marauder Horsemen as TWC....that's a lot more iffy, especially if unconverted.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/21 15:09:33
Subject: Re:Using Alternate models
|
 |
Ork Boy Hangin' off a Trukk
|
I find that it mostly comes down to "did you put work into this thing?"
Anecdotal, but I've had no issues fielding this
As a Wartrakk Skorcha, and this
As a Deffkopta.
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|