| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/24 19:38:54
Subject: Should I go 13th Company?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
I have a fair number of SW models still on sprue and since there's rumors that the 13th company is incoming, should I hold off on building them and get some CSM parts and turn them into 13th company marines?
I doubt there would be any actual rules change so this would purely be a modelling thing, so, thoughts?
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/24 19:40:03
Subject: Should I go 13th Company?
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
At this point I’d hold off for a few weeks to see sprue pics, rules, etc. You’ve waited this long, a little more time shouldn’t mater.
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/24 19:47:43
Subject: Should I go 13th Company?
|
 |
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
Good point. Currently only three of the 40-something marines were assembled, and that was just because those were some freebies I got in a trade (a buck each. Woop woop).
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/24 20:53:36
Subject: Should I go 13th Company?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Well, I had a 13th Co army when it first came out. Frankly it wasn't good enough at the competitive level since it was fully on foot and without a delivery mode.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/01/24 21:09:26
Subject: Should I go 13th Company?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
I know excitement is in the air, thing is, we don't know what it really is yet. Just wait.
After all you have Chaos Space Marines who are over 10 000 years old and we see how GW treated them. Who knows how GW will treat SW who are over 10 000 years old. SW could get the CSM treatment  .
|
Agies Grimm:The "Learn to play, bro" mentality is mostly just a way for someone to try to shame you by implying that their metaphorical nerd-wiener is bigger than yours. Which, ironically, I think nerds do even more vehemently than jocks.
Everything is made up and the points don't matter. 40K or Who's Line is it Anyway?
Auticus wrote: Or in summation: its ok to exploit shoddy points because those are rules and gamers exist to find rules loopholes (they are still "legal"), but if the same force can be composed without structure, it emotionally feels "wrong". |
|
|
 |
 |
|
|