Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Out of the entire collection of novels within the Black Library, never have I read a 40k book with such emotion. This book is by far one of Abnett's best, right next to Gaunt's Ghosts and the Ravenor trilogy. Eisenhorn, unlike so many others in this dark millennium, actually has a sense of morality and understanding with the people around him. The final book of Hereticus had put me at a loss for words and made me look back from the very beginning with the hunt for Ecyclone back on Hubris. It felt almost as if you were part of the journey. The novel gave me more of an emotional connection than let's say Catcher in the Rye or The Great Gatsby. I've never read a 40k novel until this, and it really opened my mind to reading.

However, one of the things that kept me perplexed was that unlike most books, this one had no central theme, almost no symbolism, or any literary devices. I mean, what was the message Abnett was trying to get across? Here is my analysis:

The central theme that's revolved around the Eisenhorn trilogy is the idea of duality of man which
is exemplified through Eisenhorn's descent into heresy. Cherubael, a daemonhost enslaved by Inquisitor Quixos, ultimately is the incarnation
of what Gregor will become. When Gregor first meets the daemon, he is applaud by the monstrosity of the corrupt, decaying, warp tainted creature. However, over time Eisenhorn himself also slowly decays and corrupts into something that he's not. Cherubael often hints at Gregor that they are one of the same person but at the same time they are not. The daemonhost symbolizes all that is unholy with the approach of radicalism and Gregor during the events of Xenos representing the inner being of what it means to be puritan. However, as the trilogy progresses, Eisenhorn questions his own authority and his own traditional approaches. It becomes apparent that during the events of Malleus, Gregor is getting nowhere as far as finding Quixos, Cherubael, Prophaniti, and the dozens of psykers who escaped during the Thracian Primarsis tragedy. At this point, Eisenhorn is faced with his innermost conflict. Out of the entirety of his career, always sticking by the book, always playing by the rules and always kicking it old school, where do you draw the line? Every resource that Eisenhorn has ever had at his disposal is diminished. Only a small few are left in his retinue, and at that point he has nothing left to lose. He makes the decision to cross the line into radicalism and down the path of heresy. Over the course of a few hundred years, Eisenhorn has turned into something that is almost foreign to the Gregor he once knew from Xenos. In a way, if we were to turn Eisenhorn inside out, we would see a being much like Cherubael, tainted, damned, corrupted.

Overall, this was one of the best introduction books into the 40k universe and would highly recommend it to anybody willing to put in the time and effort.


And now, I write this while awaiting for the next book
in the Bequin trilogy: Penitent.