Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

necrons, whats good in their arsenal?

Is it a good idea to take a imperial knight?

I like daemons and CSM.

An imperial knight could work if you keep it to its own flank away from the daemonkin, but unless you want some of the newer shooty options, we have access to chaos Knights.

Why not bring a Chaos Knight?

Renegades can bring a lot of shooting, which daemonkin lack.

A Necron destroyer cult could also be efficient

well I posted this because I had daemonkin army that was smashed in a recent tournament due to not having enough shooting options and horrible dice all 5 games

I looked at my list and im interested in building a flyer heavy army as one options which why I suggested necrons cause they have a lot of shooty flyers or getting an imperial knight for more shooting options

Also I though chaos knights still had experiemtnal rules or is that no longer true now?

They're still experimental. Although what exactly that means these days isn't clear. Not like they modify them based on feedback, or in any way whatsoever. With any luck they'll reduce the upgrade costs for Slaanesh/Tzeentch/Nurgle when they get chucked into a book.

More flesh hounds, and squads to collect more Blood Tithe points, then summon a blood thirster and kill shizzle. KDK will probably not ally as well as if it was being run codex pure.