Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

1500pt

D thister 2 greater rew armor of scorn, warlord
herald of K, juggernaut, greater rew lesser rew exalted locus
karanak
2x3 bloodcrusher champion whit lesser rewards
5x5 hounds
10 hounds (i will put herald here)

1850pt
just take put 3 bloodcrushers and replace them with chaos knight errant of K with dirge caster and 5 more hounds , knight works fine when a quick horde run toward enemy he cant easily handle knight.

How would you take a Chaos Knight you don't have a Lord of war slot

if i will play at 1850 i can get an IK as "detachement" if you use oathsworn detachement you can field a single IK

Ya you can field an IMPERIAL Knight, but not a Chaos Knight. So no Khorne Knights with Dirge Casters in that detachment.

The cheapest way to do it would be to run a separate CAD with the D-Thirster as the HQ and then make some cuts for 2x Nurglings.

blackmage wrote:
if i will play at 1850 i can get an IK as "detachement" if you use oathsworn detachement you can field a single IK

Chaos Knights don't get access to the IK detachments

ok listen if you want help with list is ok if you have just talk about list build i m not interested, remember in europe we play with other rules not ITC, ty. Anyway that's fine i can field an IK

blackmage wrote:
ok listen if you want help with list is ok if you have just talk about list build i m not interested, remember in europe we play with other rules not ITC, ty. Anyway that's fine i can field an IK

Nothing i've said is ITC related. Go reread the Chaos Knight rules because that where it tells you how you can take the Chaos Knight (and IK detachments aren't one of its options)

anyway still not a single useful comment beside IK or not....
reset and consider that chaos knight as a NORMAL ik....ty
or i play a CAD with D thirster and 2x3 nurglins, furies instead of karanak and poof i can get the chaos knight.... now if you interested to help and comment regardless army composition is ok, if not please dont post just to increae the counter post, tysm,Remember just 1 thing, here you can find some tournaments with own rules so you dont know why sometimes one can build, out of method armies, but you can anyway try to give your opinion on army efficency, if you like, about the build you cant because you dont know local specific rules...

So telling you that your army is illegal is not a useful comment?

Comments are fine, we're trying to help you build a list that isn't illegal. Looks like you've got it under control now.

As for the main part of the list, I think it's ok. Do you have a plan for the Bloodcrushers? I think they're a waste of points, you could take some deep striking Bloodletters for less points, or more hounds.

At 1500 you may have some problems with tank heavy lists. You really only have the D-Thirster. S5 close combat is ok, but not reliable against anything with rear armour 11+. A single Dreadnought could tie-up the entire army.

I also think that having a single D-thirster with no psychic buffs like invis or other juicy targets is going to leave him open to a lot of shooting and probably a quick death. I definitely wouldn't make him the Warlord, Herald is better for that. What's your plan for him?

 Ghaz wrote:
So telling you that your army is illegal is not a useful comment?

OMFG did you read what i wrote, any tournament have own rules, if i posted a list like that mean i can play in that particular tournament.....is that so hard to understand?


Automatically Appended Next Post:

UncleanOne wrote:
Comments are fine, we're trying to help you build a list that isn't illegal. Looks like you've got it under control now.

As for the main part of the list, I think it's ok. Do you have a plan for the Bloodcrushers? I think they're a waste of points, you could take some deep striking Bloodletters for less points, or more hounds.

At 1500 you may have some problems with tank heavy lists. You really only have the D-Thirster. S5 close combat is ok, but not reliable against anything with rear armour 11+. A single Dreadnought could tie-up the entire army.

I also think that having a single D-thirster with no psychic buffs like invis or other juicy targets is going to leave him open to a lot of shooting and probably a quick death. I definitely wouldn't make him the Warlord, Herald is better for that. What's your plan for him?

bloodletter not solve the problem of heavy armors, anyway just a dreadnought cant tie up all the army there are too many units, D thirster have the role he always have, kill veichles and hard characters, if i take it off i really have 0 answers to anything though and anyway no juicy targets? well.... let you charge 35 hounds with 4 attacks each and i think is not a good deal for many armies, bloodcsusher are played just because thank to karanak they can scout and follow the hounds, another more target for the opponent, probably yes i can use just one unit (with karanak) and get 10 bloodletters, about warlord maybe you right probably better make it an herald.What do you propose to handle heavy armors? and ty for at least a reply give me some help.


Automatically Appended Next Post:
what about this?
herald of K juggernaut, exalted locus, lesser reward warlord
2xherald of slaanesh exalted locus lev2 steed of slaanesh greater reward
2x11 orrors
2x5 fiend of slaanesh
16 hounds
9 screamers
same idea like before, lot of fast wounds on the table, i dont like seekers so i play fiends, with 3 wounds each they fit better the idea of the list.i could also play just 1 single unit of fiends and 8+8 screamers.

Yes, I did read the thread and all I saw was you posting an illegal list with nothing saying it was for a particular tournament that allowed it. Is it too hard for you to understand that you should have posted why your list was legal instead of criticizing other people who were trying to help you?

ok then those kind of post bring nothing to discussion so now i start ignore peoples, english is not my main language and cant explain all my ideas very well, sorry.