Switch Theme:

Scouting Buildings and Battlements  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Been Around the Block




Delawhere?

Yes, I realize that ITC forbids the notion of Scouting Buildings, but the ITC FAQ is basically Reeciushammer at this point (and there's nothing wrong with that), but this is a RAW conundrum I've been entertaining myself with lately.

So.

Claimed Buildings, as per the rules, are Units in your army.
Some characters/traits/etc have the ability to give Scout to Units in your army.

Ergo, Buildings can Scout. 12" even, since they're not on the list of things that can only Scout 6"

As Transport Vehicles, a Scouting Building would carry its passengers along with it when it Scouts.

But.

What happens to units on its Battlements? Or, for that matter, to the Battlements themselves?

Does the Building slide out from underneath the models deployed on top of it? Do they ride with it to its magical new destination? Do the Battlements themselves stay behind, since they are treated as a separate piece of terrain from the Building itself? If they did, would they then be cloned when the Building is redeployed?

(Obviously there are reasons why a lot of people forbid the Scouting of Buildings. Consider this more a question for the sake of fun than anything else.)

This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/02/24 17:12:53


 
   
Made in us
Fiery Bright Wizard






Idaho

doesn't the order in which you place buildings and get to choose what scouts mean that you can't scout buildings this way?

to the question, I'd say that the units on the battlement 'fall' to where the footprint of the building is. but this ruling is mainly since scouting the building in the first place is 200% cheddar.

I'll never be able to repay CA for making GW realize that The Old World was a cash cow, left to die in a field.  
   
Made in us
Lieutenant General





Florence, KY

Existing discussion on basically the same topic:

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/680462.page

'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents
cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable
defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'

- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty
Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim
 
   
Made in us
Been Around the Block




Delawhere?

Fortifications you buy for your army are just treated as another Unit in it, and are Deployed as such.

Scout kicks in after Deployment, so you could give the Building Scout (say, with Formation/Detachment rules with Skitarii) and it would have the rule when it came time to do Scout moves.

It's a Redeployment, so nothing in the rules forbids Buildings from doing it, unlike, say, Outflank, where the Building would be required to move.

The rules don't address this situation, since clearly if GW ever bothered to write FAQs and Erratas their answer would be "No, Buildings can't Scout, don't be a tosser".

But I just find it... an entertaining example of what happens when you don't think through all the permutations of your ruleset. Which happens a lot with GW, but this one in particular is amusing, given that Battlements are treated as separate pieces of terrain from the Fortifications to which they are theoretically attached.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





Eye of Terror

Wow this again already ?

Take a look at the link.

My blog... http://greenblowfly.blogspot.com

Facebook...
https://m.facebook.com/Terminus6Est/

DT:60+S++++G++++M+++B+++I+++Pw40k89/d#++D+++A++++/eWD150R++++T(T)DM+++ 
   
Made in gb
[DCM]
Et In Arcadia Ego





Canterbury

 Ghaz wrote:
Existing discussion on basically the same topic:

http://www.dakkadakka.com/dakkaforum/posts/list/680462.page


Probably best if we stick to the above thread.


The poor man really has a stake in the country. The rich man hasn't; he can go away to New Guinea in a yacht. The poor have sometimes objected to being governed badly; the rich have always objected to being governed at all
We love our superheroes because they refuse to give up on us. We can analyze them out of existence, kill them, ban them, mock them, and still they return, patiently reminding us of who we are and what we wish we could be.
"the play's the thing wherein I'll catch the conscience of the king,
 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K You Make Da Call
Go to: