Switch Theme:

Allies Compendium Rulebook  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Utilizing Careful Highlighting





Augusta GA

Anyone else think this is something GW really needs? Gather up all the ebooks, data slates, and little alliance blurbs in new boxes and white dwarfs and put them all in a single book, with an appendix and table of contents. Inquisition, assassins, war hosts and decurions that aren't in a main book and are just floating around out there in any number of sources.

Even something as cheaply made as the Inquisition ebook would be enough, just to organize the bloated amount of extra rules and factions floating out there that aren't worth the effort of individual books. Warhammer is (supposedly) a beer and pretzels game, and nothing reduces the time I spend drinking beer and eating pretzels like having to look through 4 different files on a iPad to find the stat profile for an assassin, an inquisitorial henchman, their allied warhost, and the promethium pipeline everyone is standing next to.

What is everyone's thoughts on this? Any idea for improvement?
   
Made in us
Rampaging Furioso Blood Angel Dreadnought





Boston, MA

They used to do this way back... Compendiums and Compilations. We could definitely use one now!

Please check out my photo blog: http://atticwars40k.blogspot.com/ 
   
Made in gb
Lord of the Fleet






I would buy that.
   
Made in us
Thane of Dol Guldur




It's certainly a drag to have to lug around multiple book (or I guess look up multiple, separate files, if you're an e-booker), so I'd be in favor.
   
Made in nl
Longtime Dakkanaut






Not sure how I eel about binding those into a compendium.
It would be hand to be able to pick up a book + one for all the other stuff. But it might get outdated fast.
Splitting it in multiple factions would probably be a better idea. It keeps things simple and pure for things like factions etc.

Gw might just be doing this.

Ing
harlies
deathwatch
genestealers
assasins

I am still hoping that they find the time and resources to create some criminal and mercenary factions in the future.

The thing that would make me happy is to be able to buy those data slates on paper. It doesn't have to be fancy t could even be in a white dwarf. I just really would like to be able to bring a non ebook version of my codex to show my opponent during the game and not having to carry multiple campaign books for just a few formations would also be fun.

I know we can just print it ourselves but it just isn't the same and it doesn't feel right to bring it to a store when you are playing there.

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2016/03/31 22:11:34


Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while 
   
Made in de
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator






Hamburg

This is an excellent but not new idea. With all the rules scattered over a few dozen of eBooks, dataslates, and WDs, i feel quite uninformed.

Former moderator 40kOnline

Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!

Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a "" I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."

Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss 
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: