Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Not sure if this has been asked in the last 30 days but can I bring the escalation transcendent c'tan in Conclave of the burning one? Has this been faqed anywhere?

Those formation asks for "C'tan Shard" which a Transcendant C'tan is not.

 CrownAxe wrote:
Those formation asks for "C'tan Shard" which a Transcendant C'tan is not.

Ironically, it's picture was used for the book.

Even before the current codex, it would not have applied. The GC C'tan was a different named unit to the MC C'tan Shard of the time.

Yeah it's a no.

Why would you anyway? Crypteks can only move 6" and the C'tan already has FNP

harkequin wrote:
Yeah it's a no.

Why would you anyway? Crypteks can only move 6" and the C'tan already has FNP

Not outside the Conclave they don't.

There is reasons to take the conclave. Primarily having 3 t8 models with the godshackle and abusing the wound pool a bit.

I was talking about the escalation C'tan, he's a GMC so he has FNP, he's way more mobile, and with T9 3+/4++/5+++ 6W he's durable enough to not need crypteks, putting him in the conclave would just slow him down and offer no real benefits.