| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
 |
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/06 08:16:05
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
When playing Battlefleet Gothic: Armada last night, I noticed this big thing sticking out underneath the armoured prow of my Overlord Battlecruiser. Now, I assumed this was a big gun, as my Dominator Cruiser has a Nova Cannon in the same place, but both Armada and the old BFG rulebook seem to be in agreement that it is not a weapon. Which raises the question, what exactly is it?
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/06 08:22:44
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
It's a prow ram Automatically Appended Next Post: And like a boarding tube too
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/04/06 08:23:27
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/06 09:06:55
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Drakhun
|
It's an armoured ram. Because ramming is a thing in ship to ship space combat.
|
DS:90-S+G+++M++B-IPw40k03+D+A++/fWD-R++T(T)DM+
Warmachine MKIII record 39W/0D/6L
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/06 09:26:07
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
This specific reinforced prow ram has something that looks like an barbed impaler. Gotta love impaling thing in space : D
|
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2016/04/06 09:26:40
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/06 09:32:43
Subject: Re:Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
random fun fact. some Imperial ships have those rams upgraded to be power weapons
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/07 20:44:51
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
the best random fact is the fact some of those ships come alive and have guns even the crew never knew existed...
the Speranza did it in Priests of Mars a novel written by Graham McNeill,
https://1d4chan.org/wiki/Standard_Template_Construct
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 0067/03/07 21:06:16
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Yeah, daot warships when they remember what they have are very nasty.
Spare blackhole cannon, ultra targeting....
A Navy of those.... So op the eldar would cry
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/07 21:23:29
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Most of the time it's a ram, sometime's it's a nova cannon.
|
My Armies:
5,500pts
2,700pts
2,000pts
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/07 21:29:44
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
welshhoppo wrote:It's an armoured ram. Because ramming is a thing in ship to ship space combat.
In deference to the board game, it was at least considerably difficult. Not so much the video game where you auto-ram anything you even sort of get near, including your own allies.
|
"'players must agree how they are going to select their armies, and if any restrictions apply to the number and type of models they can use."
This is an actual rule in the actual rulebook. Quit whining about how you can imagine someone's army touching you in a bad place and play by the actual rules.
Freelance Ontologist
When people ask, "What's the point in understanding everything?" they've just disqualified themselves from using questions and should disappear in a puff of paradox. But they don't understand and just continue existing, which are also their only two strategies for life. |
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/04/07 21:40:25
Subject: Imperial Navy ship prow thingy?
|
 |
Dakka Veteran
|
jhe90 wrote:Yeah, daot warships when they remember what they have are very nasty.
Spare blackhole cannon, ultra targeting....
A Navy of those.... So op the eldar would cry
Well yeah but Eldar were also much more advanced too back then ^^ I guess that Eldar did sort of rule before the fall but Imp Tech from then used now.. different story
|
|
|
 |
 |
|
|