Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So seems space marine armoured lists might actually become a thing quite useful for me as I'm currently making a space marine army of purely vehicles this will help me keep bound and ignore shaken and stunned for firing every turn.

Anvil strike force:
https://war-of-sigmar.herokuapp.com/bloggings/644

Fists of Medusa Strike Force:
https://war-of-sigmar.herokuapp.com/bloggings/645 (don't see bonuses but we can see what is taken within it)
^ also says that the cataphractii and contemptors may be taken in place of their regular counterparts

Some hints and suggestions at the new technomancy powers by the GW blog team suggest that we may be able to add armour value to a unit of vehicles armour 15 land raiders anybody?

Hints at some of the new content in the new angels of death supplement book by GW:
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/blog/blog.jsp

So what do you guys thing of some of these bonuses? I for one would love to run 3 armour 14 ironclad dreadnoughts/contemptors. Might just be me being biased towards space marine vehicles but oh well

Roknar wrote:
I don't want to hijack the thread , but are those cataphractii really an option for space marines now? Because as a CSM player that makes me really really sad.

Yeah marines get rules for all the models for BAC and then are allowed to put those in formations where it says terminators may be taken so they may replace normal terminators in 1st company task force and the contemptors may replace any mention of dreadnought in a formation so contemptors in a demi company for example

 Kanluwen wrote:
From what I saw of Technomancy, it's not that "you can add to the armour value" of something but that you can add an armor value to something--i.e. make something that normally would not have an AV have it.

That's why I said I hope that power is a Malediction, because that would be a hilarious way for Imperial players to deal with MCs and GMCs.

The thing is though they suggest adding it to a dreadnought squadron which would make me think it raises armour value

edit realised I linked wrong thing in OP

Edited the OP to include some hints from GW because I put the same link twice

but I will include it here too:
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-US/blog/blog.jsp