Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

 EnTyme wrote:
Discuss.

no.

 Galef wrote:
I'd be fine if "8th" ed was merely just 7th repackaged to include all the FAQs & Erratas, + a few MINOR tweaks (like limiting detachments and toning down GMCs). But overall leave the core rules alone. What is the point of an FAQ if the rules then change and need a new FAQ?

how, pray tell should GMCs be toned down? thanks to the FAQ, people that played them strictly RaW were apparently mistaken in their interpretation of their shooting capabilities. Given that they don't 'blow up' like superheavies when they die, how else to change them?