Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

3 times in a week now another Terrorist attack has mass slaughtered innocent civilians with 126 killed 25 of which are children and 147 injured.

http://fox40.com/2016/07/03/126-killed-including-25-children-in-baghdad-attacks-isis-claims-responsibility/

this is not good things are heating up way too fast and not long till something is done in the US like tomorrow maybe because of what the day represents to us.

They do that to US and the gak will hit the fan.

Right now US war is pretty much token.
They do not want to see full blown US air power unleashed.

Poking a at moment lazy US to react . That attack Obama could not ignore. He wild have to get-tough.

We already have an ISIS thread.

Also, you don't need to post a new thread for every newsworthy event. Most of them fall into a preexisting thread just fine.

 jhe90 wrote:
They do that to US and the gak will hit the fan.

Right now US war is pretty much token.
They do not want to see full blown US air power unleashed.

Poking a at moment lazy US to react . That attack Obama could not ignore. He wild have to get-tough.

He might even have to draw a red line?

 Iron_Captain wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:
They do that to US and the gak will hit the fan.

Right now US war is pretty much token.
They do not want to see full blown US air power unleashed.

Poking a at moment lazy US to react . That attack Obama could not ignore. He wild have to get-tough.

He might even have to draw a red line?

problem is we are in a lot of this gak because of our reaction to 9/11 the country went on the offensive (some say to countries we should not have) problem is while the country was united early on, we splintered later and caused us to pull forces out which left an opening for ISIL/ISIS to fill in.

even now like on the attack on Orlando and the shooter claimed it for ISIL even our own President would not acknowledge it was a terrorist attack by a radical Islamic.

Asterios wrote:

 Iron_Captain wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:
They do that to US and the gak will hit the fan.

Right now US war is pretty much token.
They do not want to see full blown US air power unleashed.

Poking a at moment lazy US to react . That attack Obama could not ignore. He wild have to get-tough.

He might even have to draw a red line?

problem is we are in a lot of this gak because of our reaction to 9/11 the country went on the offensive (some say to countries we should not have) problem is while the country was united early on, we splintered later and caused us to pull forces out which left an opening for ISIL/ISIS to fill in.

even now like on the attack on Orlando and the shooter claimed it for ISIL even our own President would not acknowledge it was a terrorist attack by a radical Islamic.

At some point they will force US to declare against them. This gak has to stop.

 jhe90 wrote:

Asterios wrote:

 Iron_Captain wrote:

 jhe90 wrote:
They do that to US and the gak will hit the fan.

Right now US war is pretty much token.
They do not want to see full blown US air power unleashed.

Poking a at moment lazy US to react . That attack Obama could not ignore. He wild have to get-tough.

He might even have to draw a red line?

problem is we are in a lot of this gak because of our reaction to 9/11 the country went on the offensive (some say to countries we should not have) problem is while the country was united early on, we splintered later and caused us to pull forces out which left an opening for ISIL/ISIS to fill in.

even now like on the attack on Orlando and the shooter claimed it for ISIL even our own President would not acknowledge it was a terrorist attack by a radical Islamic.

At some point they will force US to declare against them. This gak has to stop.

problem is when declaring against a people as opposed to say a country, how do you differentiate between peaceful Islamics and radical Islamics? all we can do mostly is reactionary at best.

 ScootyPuffJunior wrote:
We already have an ISIS thread.

Also, you don't need to post a new thread for every newsworthy event. Most of them fall into a preexisting thread just fine.

Please see that thread for the continuing discussion on this topic.