Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 05:35:10
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Most of the spammers that I get to see use urls's in the title.
Is it an idea to don't allow it or restrict it in some sort, in order to mess with the spammers?
|
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 08:01:09
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
They also stick out like a polar bear in the desert.
Easy to warning triangle
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 10:40:56
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
It sounds a good idea. Legoburner is the man to look into the feasibility and cost/benefit.
Like jhe90 I find the url titles very easy to spot allowing me to jump on and nail spambots easily. It is still a tedious task.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 13:19:03
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Kilkrazy wrote:It sounds a good idea. Legoburner is the man to look into the feasibility and cost/benefit.
Like jhe90 I find the url titles very easy to spot allowing me to jump on and nail spambots easily. It is still a tedious task.
maybe a automated alert?
If i HTML title is posted it triggers a notification on the behind the scenes side,
auto alert. you don't need to find them when they come to you
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 16:53:22
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Glorious Lord of Chaos
The burning pits of Hades, also known as Sweden in summer
|
In my years on Dakka I have never seen a legitimate thread with ano URL as its title.
Therefore I support this change.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 18:01:09
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
Entirely a URL I could see, but there is a thread in the N&R section right now with a URL in the title.
Anvilindustry.co.uk - Regiments Wave Two Available Now!
Seems a legit thread name.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 18:41:37
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
[MOD]
Anti-piracy Officer
Somewhere in south-central England.
|
Spam threads often have a title that is only a URL.
However it's a good idea to include a human review and decision in the loop, much as I would like to automate getting rid of spam bots.
I have over 40,000 posts and there are times it feels like at least half of them are reporting and baneing spam bots.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/16 19:26:58
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
While it might work for a little while, the spammers would quickly learn to spell it out as (dot)com or use s/l/a/s/h/e/s or even s p a c e s.
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/17 05:34:10
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
Not to mention there's been probably almost as many bots without URL thread titles and on some forums I've even seen them use clickbait titles, such as the recent Nice attack...
Some toss the URL in their sig, or somewhere on their profile, some seem to post a few kind of odd but mundane posts before getting to putting out their URL.
Sadly the only way to really automate bot removal would likely be on sign up I think. Then that could also potentially annoy people as well.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/17 06:27:00
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Gun Mage
|
Maybe make you do a Voight-Kampff test before creating threads with URLS?
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/20 20:33:35
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
We found out, a few years back, that it's not usually bots that are spamming Dakka. This came about during the great kitchen wars of 2013, as I recall, when the very word "kitchen" was stripped from the thread title options. The spammers adjusted almost instantly, inserting random characters and spaces as needed to bypass our automated defenses.
This war is won in the trenches, one "delete thread" button at a time.
|
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/21 13:49:55
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
But at the cost of great deals on kitchen renovations...
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/21 15:18:09
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Fixture of Dakka
|
In wartime, sacrifices must be made.
|
Quis Custodiet Ipsos Custodes? |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2016/07/21 22:16:26
Subject: Is it an idea to just not allow Thread Subjects that are urls?
|
 |
Keeper of the Holy Orb of Antioch
avoiding the lorax on Crion
|
Aye, soft close draws and under unit heaters must be sacrificed
|
Sgt. Vanden - OOC Hey, that was your doing. I didn't choose to fly in the "Dongerprise'.
"May the odds be ever in your favour"
Hybrid Son Of Oxayotl wrote:
I have no clue how Dakka's moderation work. I expect it involves throwing a lot of d100 and looking at many random tables.
FudgeDumper - It could be that you are just so uncomfortable with the idea of your chapters primarch having his way with a docile tyranid spore cyst, that you must deny they have any feelings at all. |
|
 |
 |
|