Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

I have tried finding the answer but no luck. In the Ork Codex Gazbag's Blitzbikes weapon profile is not twinlinked but the last sentence in the description is "Warboss Gazbag's Blitzbike is equipped with twin-linked kustom dakkablastas with the following profile: but then it does not state twinlinked.

What is the consensus in the community? Twinlinked or not?

it says its a twin linked kustom dakkablasta so its trwinlinked. Plenty of weapon are twin linked with put also having it in their weapons profile

Yeah it is a goofy-ness in many codices: they will list weapons as a Twin-linked X or Master-crafted Y, sometimes in the rules description of the weapon; but then the weapon profile(when listed in the entry) will not have the descriptive rules.

Then you run into some TFGs who will use the "Assault cannons are heavy and Heavy Flamers are assault" to then ask where the profile of your land raiders "twin-linked lascannons" is.

This is also a fun way to turn around on a TFG who is trying to rules lawyer some nonsense when they are feilding such a unit. But we all "know such a descriptive in a weapon name means that the weapon is supposed to have that rrule granted to it without writing a new profile.