| Author |
Message |
 |
|
|
|
|
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
2016/08/05 02:19:09
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
If I have two different Daemons detachments, and in one of them I have a Greater Daermon (eg Lord of Change), can I take a Daemon Prince of Tzeentch as a Heavy Support choice in a second detachment?
THe rule in question reads "Lord of Fate: If your army contains a Lord of Change, Daemon princes from this codex with the Daemon of Tzeentch upgrade are heavy support choices rather than HQ choices"
|
|
|
 |
|
2016/08/05 02:41:15
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
It says army not detachment so yeah it affects your entire army.
|
|
|
|
|
2016/08/05 06:15:40
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
The Errata posted on GW's site (link below) changed most instances of "army" to "detachment" for those rules.
https://www.games-workshop.com/en-CA/Rules-Errata
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
|
|
|
2016/08/05 06:27:10
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
Except it didn't for this rule
|
|
|
|
|
2016/08/05 06:31:03
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Insect-Infested Nurgle Chaos Lord
|
You may want to check again. First Page, second column, second-last paragraph from the bottom.
|
Gwar! wrote:Huh, I had no idea Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines posted on Dakka. Hi Graham McNeillm Dav Torpe and Pete Haines!!!!!!!!!!!!! Can I have an Autograph!
Kanluwen wrote:
Hell, I'm not that bothered by the Stormraven. Why? Because, as it stands right now, it's "limited use".When it's shoehorned in to the Codex: Space Marines, then yeah. I'll be irked.
When I'm editing alot, you know I have a gakload of homework to (not) do. |
|
|
|
|
2016/08/05 06:36:41
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Auspicious Daemonic Herald
|
 MechaEmperor7000 wrote:
You may want to check again. First Page, second column, second-last paragraph from the bottom.
I missed it. I checked the FAQ before i posted in the thread :/
|
|
|
|
|
2016/08/05 06:56:47
Subject: Greater Daemons and Heavy Support Daemon Princes in different detachments.
|
|
Trustworthy Shas'vre
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
