Switch Theme:

What are your thoughts on having a themed subfaction versus the full grand alliance?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Dakka Veteran





Scotland

I'm not yet sure how I feel about it. I like my Khorne Bloodbound and haven't yet amassed a big enough to collection to own them all however there are some really nice other Chaos model I think would be cool to own one day and would go well with my army. For example a big monster like a Bloodthirster would be great as would some Khorne marked Slaves to Darkness like the Warshrine or maybe some Chaos Knights.

Atm there are not any allegiance rules for going pure Bloodbound AFAIK but when there are I'm going to have to seriously think of whether I want to limit myself to Bloodbound for those rules or ignore them for some extra cool stuff. I also don't mean following the rules purely for mechanical benefit, once there are allegiance rules to break then it'll make me feel worse for failing them.

As an aside some of the new sub faction are small I can't imagine sticking to them. Even if they get multiple rules out of a single kit they still seem really boring.
 
Forum Index » Warhammer: Age of Sigmar
Go to: