Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

We've been using the GHB for a while now and I was wondering how big games tend to be.
Comment if you have a preference and why you prefer it.

2,000 as a minimum but I love large battles and I've played more 3,000-4,000 points games recently, using points as a rough guideline only. It's a visual hobby for me, I love seeing the battles come to life on a good battlefield so I prefer even doing only one per week of this style. Narrative games or multiplayer are my favorite.

I emphasize 1000 point games to try and get new players involved.

I play all range games. From 500 points up to 2500.

 auticus wrote:
I emphasize 1000 point games to try and get new players involved.

I play all range games. From 500 points up to 2500.

1000 is a nice range: you get a few toys and that's it, enough for a teaser. Also, Ironjawz fit perfectly at this level, with an ironfist and a foot-warboss with a warchanter, making a nice CQC force the enemy won't have too much of an answer.

The vast majority of my games are 2000, though personally I would prefer more variety.