Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

im thinking about making a vanity purchase for my kdk army and getting a forgeworld thirster, but im trying to get a concept on how much larger it is compared to the current GW model. I have not been able to find a image of the two side by side on google, would anyone be able to through up a shot if you have both models would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks!

http://pro.bols.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/thirsters.jpg

Here ya go. Personally I still prefer the Forge World Thirster. The GW one occupies about as much volume, but that's because it's more frayed out than the FW one, who has arms like literal tree trunks.

An'ggrath is probably my favourite Forgeworld model.

Although I'm sure no one would complain if you used him as a regular Bloodthirster, he is a bit too big for a T6 W5 monstrous creature.

Thanks for the speedy response. That gives me a better perspective. I enjoyed all generations in the same pic goes to show how much modelling has evolved.

The forgeworld version looks far more impressive.

But costs more and more trickey to transport with a long whips and such.

Also shows a model scale creep..
The old ones are smaller.. And evolution of details is impressive.