Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

The imperial agents formation inquisitorial warband... I can see it being read both ways. How would you play the following situation. This new warband is a unit comprised of units. There is a little 1 next to the "units" int he formation that join into a single unit, while their is a special rule that says you may include another unit based on what inquisitor you take in the inquisitorial warband.

So... let's say I take a hereticus inqusiitor, 3 jokero, a priest, and 10 sisters of battle.
which of the following would be how you read this situation?

A) The jokero, priest, and 10 sisters all become one unit the inquisitor can join
OR
B) the jokero and the priest become a unit and the sisters are a separate unit. The inquisitor can join either.

This Sisters aren't part of the unit. Just the Acolytes, Inquisitor, and whatever else you pepper in.

even the inquisitor doesn't have to be part of the unit, he doesn't have the little 1 next to him