Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

Also if you have the keyword tzeentch you can use this book, mixed armies of tzeentch and slaves to darkness! Oh boy! I know what my project is going to be.

Also as a Death fan considering battletomes follow the same format in new iterations I can rest somewhat. I did ask them in chat that Death could use a similar tome.

They noted my "feedback" will be passed on to the right people. I hope *fingers crossed*

YAY TZEENTCH! PRAISE CHANGE.

 Cephalobeard wrote:
Any new daemon models?

They said the release will be over several weeks so I expect there will be more new models considering the cover of the tome a new LOC is a given I think.

 Mymearan wrote:
From what they said on the stream this sounds AWESOME. They're iterating fast on these Battletomes, which is too bad for people who got some of the first ones, but very good for the game overall. And seeing as I've already got a Mortal/Demon/Arcanite force in progress....

Honestly I do think the next general's handbook will be most interesting in context of this new tome I could see certain factions being able to more easily work together without losing benefit's like disciplines of tzeentch just relying on the tzeentch keyword. As I said before as Death player I feel this format will work best for death since they suffer similar problems to tzeentch.

 EnTyme wrote:
This is a bad time to be needing to save money.

Yup, and honestly EnTyme they pretty much did what we BOTH wanted it's free and unique at the same time! RIP wallet.

It also seems the newer stuff have low armor saves so armies that can deal with infantry should being able to deal with this. Well depending on how you build your tzeentch army but considering all you need is the tzeentch keyword to get the battletome efffects I think we will see interesting armies.

I am just happy my dream Tzeentch force can now be done. Considering the sheer possible options I don't know how to go about it.

Perhaps going more cultist with daemons on the side or more the heavy armored battle mage? Or pure daemons? The options

Or a mix of everything?

 Manfred von Drakken wrote:

 shinros wrote:
I am just happy my dream Tzeentch force can now be done. Considering the sheer possible options I don't know how to go about it.

Perhaps going more cultist with daemons on the side or more the heavy armored battle mage? Or pure daemons? The options

Or a mix of everything?

I'm gonna go with 'mix of everything'. I've got plenty of Warriors and a handful of daemons. Just gotta add me some Tzaangors and Acolytes and call it good.

Man we haven't even seen everything in the book yet I am thinking about doing a sorcerer lord who was one of those corrupted upon going to the new city like has been said on the stream. It was a herald of tzeentch that was the messenger and when the lord came into his own he bound said Herald to service for 90 years 9 months and 9 days. Tzeentch shall rise!

 Lansirill wrote:
I was really planning on doing an infernal tetrad in 40k (even bought a cheap nurgle prince from raging heroes for it.)

Now, hell, I don't know. Going mono- tzeentch is tempting... Although it would break my plan of just having one army for AoS.

embrace change! You know you want to!