Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 01:14:00
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Hey guys and gals thank you for taking the time and reading this.
I have a quick question, your opnion as well as any facts would be great. Who is the most defense based army in the game.
The guys who sit back hold the line never back down or fall back.
I got it narrowed down to imperal guard, imperal firsts or tau. I know they are toy soldiers but any loss always bugs me. I loved dwarfs for that reason. Also I tend to play less then I do set up scenery ect. So a army that can look good bunkered in for the long haul would be nice.
What you think?
|
I need to go to work every day.
Millions of people on welfare depend on me. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 01:17:14
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
I would say Necrons. You can stack quite a few bonuses to the RP. They can be a pain to kill off.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 01:34:58
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
The Marine Standing Behind Marneus Calgar
|
I’ll agree that necrons can take a stupid amount of fire.
Tau are fine, up until something actually reaches them. Now the odds of stuff living that long are low however. Their mechs/suits actually promote a more hit-and-move play style then pure gunline. I’d pass on them for “rugged defenders”
Guard do it well. Blobs of troops, with some commissars and officers to keep the men in line. They do well for a hold the line army. If they do get stuck in CC, they have a lot of men to toss into the fray while the rest keeps shooting. Probably the best for tossing fire downrange while dug in.
Fists are one of the classic siege experts from the fluff. The individual squads are going to be able to hold their own much better then the guard, not needing HQs to stiffen their resolve. But the SM codex does not excel at gunlines. Not that you can’t fake it pretty well, but it’s not our strength.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 01:37:55
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Dangerous Skeleton Champion
|
Yeah, on top of that Necrons have toughness 4 or 5 on everything and leadership 10 across the board. The only issue you might have is with the sitting back part. They have midrange weapons which means that while your troops are tough they don't always sit back.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/01/06 01:38:29
Necrons
Imperial Knights
Orcs and Goblins
Tomb Kings
Wood Elves
High Elves |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 01:47:49
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
Iron Warriors with the update are pretty good defenders!
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 05:56:48
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
Fruzzle wrote:Iron Warriors with the update are pretty good defenders!
yeah they have the benifit of being able to take a decurion with fortifications.
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 06:55:39
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Any gunline based army really. Even orks can be defense based.
|
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 07:23:19
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Tau are actually fairly aggro if you want to win at higher levels. The sit back style is for the newbies.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 07:58:03
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Hurr! Ogryn Bone 'Ead!
|
My first instinct was Guard. The others are smaller and more elite (compared to guard). Also, the sheer number of troops that you can put down (and the subsequent number of dice rolls) can be intimidating.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 08:34:53
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Committed Chaos Cult Marine
|
Honestly, maybe a GSF with Razorbacks and Rhinos coming out the ying-yang. You just put everything behind blown-up tanks and chill.
Fruzzle wrote:Iron Warriors with the update are pretty good defenders!
Not against Tau. 3+ and Cover saves do squat against a handful of Riptides and Pathfinders. They also don't have the firepower to whittle down the incoming firepower either. I'd honestly say Emperor's Children (4+ FnP and Fearless) or Death Guard (T5, 5+ FnP, and Fearless) is better than the Iron Warriors (6+ FnP, Fearless in Fortifications). Just go CAD with the two other Legions.
oldzoggy wrote:Any gunline based army really. Even orks can be defense based.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 09:37:27
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Gamgee wrote:Tau are actually fairly aggro if you want to win at higher levels. The sit back style is for the newbies.
Tremble in fear of the Tau herds commanded by veteran players, for their aggressive assaults are legendary...
|
Inactive, user. New profile might pop up in a while |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 10:11:39
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Fighter Ace
|
Tau can kite you in circles around the board. It's not a static gun line at all.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 10:56:15
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Commander of the Mysterious 2nd Legion
|
oldzoggy wrote: Gamgee wrote:Tau are actually fairly aggro if you want to win at higher levels. The sit back style is for the newbies.
Tremble in fear of the Tau herds commanded by veteran players, for their aggressive assaults are legendary...
you're confusing agressive play with assault focus, one can be very agressive but still be "ranged shooty"
|
Opinions are not facts please don't confuse the two |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 11:44:36
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle
|
Honestly it would have to be Tau or necrons to me both just sit in a corner far away and shoot you to death. most boring gameplay there is but hey some like it.
|
Facts are chains that bind perception and fetter truth. For a man can remake the world if he has a dream and no facts to cloud his mind. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 15:57:23
Subject: Re:Most defense based army?
|
 |
On a Canoptek Spyder's Waiting List
Salisbury, UK
|
Necrons could pull it off well, get the Decurion going so 4+ RP and the auxillary choices being a couple of annihilation nexus, 72" doomsday cannon can get the units that try and stay outside of your 24" range then throw a couple of triarch stalkers around your infantry blobs to give them the +1 BS so they're hitting on 2's...
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 20:18:54
Subject: Re:Most defense based army?
|
 |
Willing Inquisitorial Excruciator
|
Gotta say some of my most memorable games have been defensive guards. Generally I prefer mobile guards with chimeras but holding that gunline against whatever form of madness and death comming your way has an epic feel to it. Nothing quite like a hundred lasguns desperatly trying to hold the line. There's been times when a single combined squad streched from one end of the board to the other in order to deny deep strikes. Maybe not so helpfull to the overall thread though.
|
His pattern of returning alive after being declared dead occurred often enough during Cain's career that the Munitorum made a special ruling that Ciaphas Cain is to never be considered dead, despite evidence to the contrary. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/06 20:49:16
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Ancient Space Wolves Venerable Dreadnought
|
You're asking two seperate questions.
Necrons are the toughest, they take the most abuse and keep on kicking, but they're also kind of mid-ranged in their firepower which means a Necron player has to actively advance his/her pieces to win a lot of matches, even against melee hungry armies like the Space Wolves who deliver most of their forces to the Necron player.
Tau are the shootiest army but their tactic is shoot and run the hell away. For Tau to win they have to stay mobile and just out of short range shooting and charge ranges.
The most defensive army is Imperial Guard, they purchase fortifications and dig themselves in. They rely on cover and high AV metal boxes and being able to threaten at long range. Guard struggle against Tau something fierce and make a terrible tournament army but if you're willing to spend an entire day playing a game Imperial Guard can make a day of it.
|
I don't break the rules but I'll bend them as far as they'll go. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 04:26:25
Subject: Re:Most defense based army?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
Salt Lake City
|
My vote for most defensive army has to go to a Death Korps of Krieg siege regiment. Sit back and drum-roll, artillery barrage them Verdun-style with dirt cheap Earthshaker and Medusa carriages, heavy mortars, quad launchers, and Colossus bombards! I don't think any other army can pack so many pie plates! Plus, the DKoK SoV special rules are all about digging in, holding the line, and dishing the pain. Check'em out.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 12:39:01
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Waaagh! Ork Warboss
Italy
|
I would say astra militarum as other shooty armies are much more mobile. The little humans tipically stay stationary and fire.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 13:02:15
Subject: Re:Most defense based army?
|
 |
Hardened Veteran Guardsman
France
|
Guard with some sort of fortification and spamming artillery. Works for me, and that 4+ cover save (3+ with camo net) will toughen up your vehicles, and 2+ gtg save for your blob. But you're kinda screwed when your opponent brings lots of cover ignoring gimmicks
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 13:18:42
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Ladies Love the Vibro-Cannon Operator
|
Necrons. No need to hide them in cover or behind an aegis.
Overlords with CCB are very durable vs shooting.
|
Former moderator 40kOnline
Lanchester's square law - please obey in list building!
Illumini: "And thank you for not finishing your post with a " " I'm sorry, but after 7200 's that has to be the most annoying sign-off ever."
Armies: Eldar, Necrons, Blood Angels, Grey Knights; World Eaters (30k); Bloodbound; Cryx, Circle, Cyriss |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 19:43:13
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Humorless Arbite
|
I love the IG, specifically with my Fortress of Redemption. For me they are the perfect 'defence' army. They might not be the toughest or the deadliest but they're the most awesome in my opinion.
With a Void Shield on each section and manned by 42+ troops, protected by Tarantula sentry guns in front and Sabre Defence batteries behind - it's truly a statement of "Come at me bro".
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 21:42:05
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Jovial Plaguebearer of Nurgle
|
Death guard in the new traitor legions book
Their durability is actually quite impressive
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 21:51:31
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Troubled By Non-Compliant Worlds
|
Tau, Crons and TL DG
|
Ultra-Ultramarines are a great idea. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/07 22:30:45
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Fighter Ace
|
Ig with a bane blade is pretty damn scary.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/09 03:40:00
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Freaky Flayed One
|
Ubl1k wrote:Honestly it would have to be Tau or necrons to me both just sit in a corner far away and shoot you to death. most boring gameplay there is but hey some like it.
I take it you've never gone up against a triple Canoptek harvest list.
|
Ain't no kill like overkill.
48,500+
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/09 05:40:44
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Regular Dakkanaut
|
For sheer defensive traits Imperial Guard. Though it does require some game and strategy know how.
You can take 50 guardsmen for 250. That is absurd, plus conscript for dirt cheap.
I hate gunlines but I love guard. So I often take allies, GSC or Marines to compensate for their lack of CC and super mobility.
Take an imperial Strongpoint. I recommend at least 1 Bastion, though two is more fun. Put the quad cannon on them. Put both infantry platoon squads in there. Take at least 2 Ageis lines, ideally 3. If youre feeling sassy, take the Skyway landing pad as well and give it an ammo dump.
Spread out these fortifications as you please. Take at least 1 full infantry platoon. 1PCS, 4 IP (2@20), and a mortor team or two, plus a special weapons squad or two for good measure. Take conscripts and put a commisar with them.
Take at least 2 command squads, 3 is good for redundancy. Kit them out with Laz cannons or autocannons, or give them Master of Ordience.
Take a punisher or exterminator for extra firepower. and Bubble wrap your tank squad with the conscirpts.
Setup a caste with your Bastions, and form the Ageis defense lines around them to give you the best cover and cross fire befnits possible with the terrain. Place your guardsmen in gunlines behind the Ageis and have your heavy weapons teams scattered about. Place your specialist weapon teams inebtween or whereever they might need to be (flamer squad to give wall of death if something gets too close). And just pour laz gun volly, mortor fire (or autocannons; i prefer autocannons) from your firebase.
Your Command squad should be throwing out orders to ignore cover, or tank hunter all over the place. As soon as anything is about to shoot your gunlines (which they will, 20 squads draw attention) goto ground. As soon as your turn comes back up, issue your get back in the fight orders and pretend like nothing happened.
The restrcitions for castleguard is nearly nothing and its always fun to play. Placing tanks or huge squads of infantry on the skyway landing pad is a good way of pissing off your oppoent or making his shots disapear or wasted.
Ageis defense lines, grant your normally paper thin guardsmen armor a 2+cover save.
Bastions are hardy with 4 HP and AV14 and can take a host of extra weapons (faced anywhere due to faq: [4hvy bolters on one side if you please]) and building upgrades with lots of fire points.
Your command squads get back in the fight are your lynchpin, so makes ure you have at least two, ideally three.
READ ALL OF THE STRONGHOLD ASSAULT BOOK. It may not seem great to you, but as soon as you realize, you can place 50 guardsmen ontop of a skyway landing pad, take an ammo store and a medicae kit and grant every model ontop rerolls of 1 to hit and feel no pain 5+ with a 4++ save or a 3+ save if they goto ground. You will not regret it.
|
8th Overhaul!
Over 18,000 SM
Over 7000 Tyranids
About 3000 Genestealer cult
About 6000 IG
About 2500 Chaos
About 5000 Skitarii/Admech *Current focus
About 3000 Deamons
2 Imperial Knigts... Soon to be a third
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/09 15:59:27
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
[DCM]
Moustache-twirling Princeps
Gone-to-ground in the craters of Coventry
|
Tsol wrote:READ ALL OF THE STRONGHOLD ASSAULT BOOK. It may not seem great to you, but as soon as you realize, you can place 50 guardsmen ontop of a skyway landing pad, take an ammo store and a medicae kit and grant every model ontop rerolls of 1 to hit and feel no pain 5+ with a 4++ save or a 3+ save if they goto ground. You will not regret it.
This.
Buildings are the epitome of defensiveness.
For a troop-based army, look at the Wall of Martyrs. It is trenches and bunkers, and you can spread your army out while staying in cover.
For more specialised armies, the Strongpoint has less coverage, but more defensiveness. It is rooms and walls in place of trenches and bunkers, so allows for better firing points for the units, and more cover for vehicles.
|
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/09 17:20:05
Subject: Re:Most defense based army?
|
 |
Stalwart Veteran Guard Sergeant
|
Guard are the best defenders IMO because of the sheer number of infantry and long range firepower they have. In a 1500 pt game you can literally cover your entire deployment zone with fearless bodies (using priests), denying deepstrikers and outflankers any access to your side of the board, while STILL having the points left over to use artillery and tanks. When you add in allies or fortifications... the shenanigans become ludicrous.
|
- 10,000 pts |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/01/09 23:28:20
Subject: Most defense based army?
|
 |
Fighter Ace
|
A full unit of guardsmen behind an adl with the two shot order is a pain in the ass no matter how tough you are. Those flashlights are bright.
|
|
 |
 |
|