Switch Theme:

Spell Targetting Question  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
40kenthus






Yoor Speeshawl too Gawd!

I was playing with my Daemonic legion led by Be'Lakor and he has a rule that if a spell cast at him you roill miscast on any double.  Well the player i was playing against rolled for a flame template spell and rolled double but claimed he was targetting an out of range unit with the spell that was onthe other side of Be'Lakor.  They were clearly out of range and BeLakor was the closest  target.  I let him do this nothing came of it but is this legal?  I know it is a bit on the shady side.

Only now do I realize how much I prefer Pete Haines' "misprints" to Gav Thorpe's "brainfarts." :Abadabadoobaddon 
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut




Los Angeles

Unless I'm crazy, you cast the spell before you resolve it's effects. That's part of the fun of the magic phase. "Am I in range? What the hell. 8, nice."

"Is he in range? I don't think so. I'll let it slide."

"23.5. Got ya!"

As far as I know, it's just like shooting. If you choose to shoot at something out of range, you don't get to shoot at something else. Same deal for magic. You cast, dispel if desired, and then resolve effects. If the target is out of range, you resolve nothing.

So he should have bitten the bullet, taken the miscast, and learned to be more careful next time.

"The last known instance of common sense happened at a GT. A player tried to use the 'common sense' argument vs. Mauleed to justify his turbo-boosted bikes getting a saving throw vs. Psycannons. The player's resulting psychic death scream erased common sense from the minds of 40k players everywhere. " - Ozymandias 
   
Made in us
Using Inks and Washes






Don't you have to nominate whom you are casting against prior to rolling to see if the spell goes off. e.g I am casting X spell at unit Y.

So isn't the error on both sides. One for not clearly stating the target, and the opponent for not requiring it.


2014 will be the year of zero GW purchases. Kneadite instead of GS, no paints or models. 2014 will be the year I finally make the move to military models and away from miniature games. 
   
Made in us
[DCM]
Tzeentch's Fan Girl






Southern New Hampshire

For most spells, yes: You nominate the target, then roll for casting. Spells like the Comet, however, don't care.

She/Her

"There are no problems that cannot be solved with cannons." - Chief Engineer Boris Krauss of Nuln

LatheBiosas wrote:I have such a difficult time hitting my opponents... setting them on fire seems so much simpler.

Kid_Kyoto wrote:"Don't be a dick" and "This is a family wargame" are good rules of thumb.


DR:80S++G++M--B+IPwhfb01#+D+++A+++/fWD258R++T(D)DM+++
 
   
 
Forum Index » The Old World & Legacy Warhammer Fantasy Discussion
Go to: