Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you: No adverts like this in the forums anymore. Times and dates in your local timezone. Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance. Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely. Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net. If you are already a member then feel free to login now.

So as the tittle says, I cant pick between the tree people and and the angry people. The bloodbound feel like a more heroic force, they have more character and personality. Whereas the sylvaneth seem more fun to play.

What are your impressions of both armies, pros cons of both?

As someone who runs both armies, I can tell you that Khorne's playstyle is significantly simpler (run in and kill), but list building is more complex. It's all about finding the right synergies. Sylvaneth is currently the stronger army having plenty of monsters, mobility, and shooting, but they have a much steeper learning curve when it comes to strategy. Neither army is going to "play itself", but if you're new to AoS, Bloodbound would probably be a better starting army from a learning angle, but the important question is "which set of models do you like better"?

Khorne is simpler and more deadly.

Just take a screen unit of blood reavers, backed with 2 units of blood letters, take 2 blood stokers and 2 blood secretors, 1-2 warp lightning cannons and of course the auto take Sayl the faithless.

You'll go second often but you'll win games in your first 2 turns 90% of the time.

@EnTyme, I dont mind a steep learning curve I mostly play against friends. I dont want an army Ill get bored with.

@TheIronCrow are you just using the chaos book or the bloodbound book?