Author |
Message |
 |
|
 |
Advert
|
Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
- No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
- Times and dates in your local timezone.
- Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
- Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
- Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now. |
|
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:19:31
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
So this is a 4 pronged question that comes up often between me and my friend because he plays GSC and I play KDK, both which have summoning in different ways.
1. In an ITC game which formation, if any, do the GSC summoned units belong to? As far as I know ALL units in a bound army MUST belong to a formation or detachment but we cant find anywhere in ITC or the normal rules that states what formation or detachment the summons belong to. Do they belong to the same formation as the summoner?
2. In an ITC game which formation, if any do the KDK summoned units belong to? They are NOT summoned by any character or model so its hard to argue where they belong?
3. Same question as #1 but in a non ITC setting, if its different at all.
4. Same question as #2 but in a non ITC setting.
We have been playing that they belong to whatever formation the summoner belongs to, or the main formation of KDK but if we do that another issue arises. What if the KDK player summons a unit of bloodcrushers and I only have a slaughtercult which does not allow bloodcrushers? Would they receive any formation bonuses?
Thanks, and sorry for the lengthy question but we cant find an answer anywhere.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/02/11 23:36:27
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:34:45
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a detacment or formation?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
Now I cant help much with the ITC rules but point number 1 is in regards to list building. When building your list every unit has to belong to a formation.
When you summon using Malefic they are chaos daemon faction as per the spells and they did not belong to any formation as they werent part of the formation when you built your list.
That should also answer the question for KDK (but KDK faction) but not got book to hold to check.
|
40kGlobal AOA member, regular of Overlords podcast club and 4tk gaming store. Blogger @ http://sanguinesons.blogspot.co.uk/
06/2013: 1st at War of the Roses ETC warm up.
08/213: 3rd place double teams at 4tk
09/2013: 7th place, best daemon and non eldar/tau army at Northern Warlords GT
10/2013: 3rd/4th at Battlefield Birmingham
11/2013: 5th at GT heat 3
11/2013: 5th COG 2k at 4tk
01/2014: 34th at Caledonian
03/2014: 3rd GT Final |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:36:06
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a detacment or formation?
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
So when it says a unit MUST belong to a Detachment or formation it only applies to list building and not in the game?
|
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:40:38
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Lady of the Lake
|
However I think I remember the draft FAQ at one point saying that objective secured is transferred from the summoner to the summoned. Take it with a grain of salt however because I can't remember where or even if it were taken back in another version of it. But yeh, that applies to list building.
|
This message was edited 1 time. Last update was at 2017/02/11 23:40:53
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:41:48
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
I hate to be picky but can someone reference a page number because I cant find it anywhere and Id like to be able to show my friend.
Im checking the GW faq right now.
|
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:46:43
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Lieutenant General
|
|
'It is a source of constant consternation that my opponents cannot correlate their innate inferiority with their inevitable defeat. It would seem that stupidity is as eternal as war.'
- Nemesor Zahndrekh of the Sautekh Dynasty Overlord of the Crownworld of Gidrim |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/11 23:53:23
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Stalwart Tribune
|
Didnt see the other thread, thanks for the link. Does anyone know if ITC has ruled about this at all?
|
Civilization is the progress toward a society of privacy. The savage's whole existence is public, ruled by the laws of his tribe. Civilization is the process of setting man free from men. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/12 03:49:34
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Monster-Slaying Daemonhunter
|
ITC follows GW rules except when noted. They have a faq question anyways that answers this in agreement with GW.
Go to ITC FAQ.
Press 'Ctrl+F'
Type 'summ'
Read entries containing 'summ' until you find your answer.
I just did it and it took me all of 35 seconds to find it.
|
LVO 2017 - Best GK Player
The Grimdark Future 8500 1500  6000 2000 5000
"[We have] an inheritance which is beyond the reach of change and decay." 1 Peter 1.4
"With the Emperor there is no variation or shadow due to change." James 1.17
“Fear the Emperor; do not associate with those who are given to change.” Proverbs 24.21 |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/12 09:48:30
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Fireknife Shas'el
Lisbon, Portugal
|
Just to clarify, a formation is a type of detachment
|
AI & BFG: / BMG: Mr. Freeze, Deathstroke / Battletech: SR, OWA / Fallout Factions: BoS / HGB: Caprice / Malifaux: Arcanists, Guild, Outcasts / MCP: Mutants / SAGA: Ordensstaat / SW Legion: CIS / WWX: Union
Unit1126PLL wrote:"FW is unbalanced and going to ruin tournaments."
"Name one where it did that."
"IT JUST DOES OKAY!"
Shadenuat wrote:Voted Astra Militarum for a chance for them to get nerfed instead of my own army. |
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/12 15:10:57
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Norn Queen
|
FAQ states that Termagants generated by a Tervigon count as being a part of the detachment the Tervigon is from. They also always count as troops (their normal FOC slot) regardless of whether the Tervigon was taken as a troop or HQ choice. It goes on to specify that in the standard CAD those generated Termagants gain ObSec.
I imagine the mechanics behind Tervigons are more or less the same as summoned units. The Tervigons ability is summoning with a very specific unit you can summon and a different fluff explanation.
|
These are my opinions. This is how I feel. Others may feel differently. This needs to be stated for some reason.
|
|
 |
 |
![[Post New]](/s/i/i.gif) 2017/02/12 19:24:59
Subject: Summoned units belonging to a Detachment or formation?
|
 |
Longtime Dakkanaut
|
You can imagine it, but they are completely different things.
I mean, they could be from a completely different faction, how could they join the detachment that summoned them?
Without FAQ guidance Summoned units are not part of any detachment.
|
DFTT |
|
 |
 |
|