Switch Theme:

Were the Tau hooves changed?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





A few years back the when more Tau kits were released, did the look of their hooves get changed from how they used to be? Looking at some of the newer things, it seems really inconsistent between the Art, old models and the new ones.

The art previously (and some of it still does) shows the Tau to have more of a large single split hoof with a small side-toe, like here:
Spoiler:


This was also in line with the Old firewarrior kit, which had something similar, a central split hoof with a very small side-toe.

Now though, it seems there might be several different styles. You've got Firewarriors who now have one larger and one fairly large but smaller toes/hooves that have just s light separation but are still connected:
Spoiler:

but there's newer art like this as well:
Spoiler:


Then you've got the Fireblade who has more squared toes with much more seperation between them and overall less of the hoof visible:
Spoiler:


I can't really figure out how they're meant to be now. Are the Old firewarrior kits now entirely wrong?

This message was edited 2 times. Last update was at 2017/04/28 14:11:59


 
   
Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






 Mentlegen324 wrote:
A few years back the when more Tau kits were released, did the look of their hooves get changed from how they used to be? Looking at some of the newer things, it seems really inconsistent between the Art, old models and the new ones.

The art previously (and some of it still does) shows the Tau to have more of a large single split hoof with a small side-toe, like here:
Spoiler:


This was also in line with the Old firewarrior kit, which had something similar, a central split hoof with a very small side-toe.

Now though, it seems there might be several different styles. You've got Firewarriors who now have one larger and one fairly large but smaller toes/hooves that have just s light separation but are still connected:
Spoiler:

but there's newer art like this as well:
Spoiler:


Then you've got the Fireblade who has more squared toes with much more seperation between them and overall less of the hoof visible:
Spoiler:


I can't really figure out how they're meant to be now. Are the Old firewarrior kits now entirely wrong?


maybe they have genetic differences lore wise. like humans some people have all toes angled down some have a big toe and 3 relatively same size toes then a pinky toe.

10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in dk
Servoarm Flailing Magos






Metalica

 G00fySmiley wrote:
 Mentlegen324 wrote:
A few years back the when more Tau kits were released, did the look of their hooves get changed from how they used to be? Looking at some of the newer things, it seems really inconsistent between the Art, old models and the new ones.

The art previously (and some of it still does) shows the Tau to have more of a large single split hoof with a small side-toe, like here:
Spoiler:


This was also in line with the Old firewarrior kit, which had something similar, a central split hoof with a very small side-toe.

Now though, it seems there might be several different styles. You've got Firewarriors who now have one larger and one fairly large but smaller toes/hooves that have just s light separation but are still connected:
Spoiler:

but there's newer art like this as well:
Spoiler:


Then you've got the Fireblade who has more squared toes with much more seperation between them and overall less of the hoof visible:
Spoiler:


I can't really figure out how they're meant to be now. Are the Old firewarrior kits now entirely wrong?


maybe they have genetic differences lore wise. like humans some people have all toes angled down some have a big toe and 3 relatively same size toes then a pinky toe.


That would explain everything except for the wildly different hoof in the first picture. Which I actually like a lot more than the big toe nails.

 
   
Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






are they toenals? I painted them as boots over their hooves

10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in dk
Servoarm Flailing Magos






Metalica

 G00fySmiley wrote:
are they toenals? I painted them as boots over their hooves

Looking at the pictures, yeah, I'd say they are. They seem to just be wearing ankle warmers, but have their feet bare.

 
   
Made in us
Snord




Midwest USA

If their hooves are anything like Terran horses, then they may keep them trimmed down and care for them in similar ways. Watch a video or read an article about shoeing horses, and you might get some ideas. My guess would be that their hooves grow constantly over their lives, as they would get worn down over time and would need to be replacing old, worn, or dead hoof tissue. Otherwise, we would see them wearing foot coverings to protect their feet. To me, any discrepancies in hoof sizes between model could be explained by that. Any discrepancies in artwork can be attributed to artistic license and artist interpretation; I mean, the proportions in the first piece of artwork are in a more realistic, human-like scale rather than in 40K's Heroic Scale used on the models.

Lol, I just realized. Going around the galaxy without and foot coverings on? The Tau are just a second-breakfast away from being space Halflings!
   
Made in gb
Longtime Dakkanaut





 G00fySmiley wrote:
are they toenals? I painted them as boots over their hooves


They were their actual hooves, not boots. It's pretty clear looking at a model like Aun'Shi without the ankle wrappings:

   
Made in es
Grim Dark Angels Interrogator-Chaplain




Vigo. Spain.

If Typhus can use a wood Scythe, then Taus can go with their hooves for the galaxy!

And... I'll be honest. I had just go to check this and my firewarriors had the old hoove style. I didn't noticed the change with the new warrior box

 Crimson Devil wrote:

Dakka does have White Knights and is also rather infamous for it's Black Knights. A new edition brings out the passionate and not all of them are good at expressing themselves in written form. There have been plenty of hysterical responses from both sides so far. So we descend into pointless bickering with neither side listening to each other. So posting here becomes more masturbation than conversation.

ERJAK wrote:
Forcing a 40k player to keep playing 7th is basically a hate crime.

 
   
Made in us
Mekboy on Kustom Deth Kopta






it looks like that ethereal has a dew claw. that is interesting though if you prefer the old way seems easy enough to clip

10000 points 7000
6000
5000
5000
2000
 
   
Made in gb
Dakka Veteran




Don't go looking in Xenology OP...
   
Made in hk
Fresh-Faced New User




Wow the fireblade is totally different. Didn't know that. What were they thinking? They practically made it digitigrade. Suddenly I'm really glad I converted my own fireblade from a tank commander.
   
Made in us
Longtime Dakkanaut





1 - I'm not noticing a significant difference between the feet art.
2 - Decently high chance its just artist differences
3 - Even among humans there are people with big feet and small feet, wide toes and long toes. So, it's reasonable to assume that different Tau have slightly different feet shapes.

It's probably pretty established that different Castes have vastly different body shapes. Can the different Castes breed with each other? What are the end results?


6+ = 6/36 | Reroll 1s = 7/36 | Reroll Misses = 11/36 ||||||| 5+ = 12/36 | Reroll 1s 14/36 | Reroll Misses = 20/36 ||||||| 4+ = 18/36 | Reroll 1s 21/36 | Reroll Misses = 27/36
3+ = 24/36 | Reroll 1s 28/36 | Reroll Misses = 32/36 ||||||| 2+ = 30/36 | Reroll 1s 35/36 ||||||| Highest of 2d6 = 4.47
 
   
Made in dk
Servoarm Flailing Magos






Metalica

 Talamare wrote:
1 - I'm not noticing a significant difference between the feet art.
2 - Decently high chance its just artist differences
3 - Even among humans there are people with big feet and small feet, wide toes and long toes. So, it's reasonable to assume that different Tau have slightly different feet shapes.

It's probably pretty established that different Castes have vastly different body shapes. Can the different Castes breed with each other? What are the end results?


#2 I absolutely agree with, but you are saying you see no significant difference between

and

?

They're like from completely different species. The model has a foot that has flesh all the way down to the ground, with large nails shoved in it. The art has what much more looks like a complete although cloven hoof. Something along the lines of a giraffe.


Or even more just a horse's hoof with a cleft halfway through the front of it. Goat's hooves seem like a pretty fair inspiration for the hoof in the artwork, but the model has no real resemblance to it.

This message was edited 3 times. Last update was at 2017/05/01 12:22:37


 
   
Made in us
Beautiful and Deadly Keeper of Secrets





Maybe they just felt it went better with the models aesthetics.
   
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: