Switch Theme:

Do 8th-ed blasts strike anyone else as underwhelming?  [RSS] Share on facebook Share on Twitter Submit to Reddit
»
Author Message
Advert


Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
  • No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
  • Times and dates in your local timezone.
  • Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
  • Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
  • Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.




Made in us
Charging Dragon Prince





Sticksville, Texas

Well, I just bought two Russes... planned on making them Executioners anyways because plasma is just hilarious, and my army uses a lot of plasma anyways. Don't care too much how good or bad it will be since I just play for fun.

Played a Steel Legion Guard army in 7th and was very rarely disappointed in my standard Leman Russ. We all played fun armies, and the standard Battle Cannon was a marine murdering machine. A bit sad to see its basic stats in 8th so far, but without having all the variants main weapon stats I will hold off making a judgment either way. Here's to hoping a triple Plasma Executioner will be fun though.
 
Forum Index » 40K General Discussion
Go to: