Forum adverts like this one are shown to any user who is not logged in. Join us by filling out a tiny 3 field form and you will get your own, free, dakka user account which gives a good range of benefits to you:
No adverts like this in the forums anymore.
Times and dates in your local timezone.
Full tracking of what you have read so you can skip to your first unread post, easily see what has changed since you last logged in, and easily see what is new at a glance.
Email notifications for threads you want to watch closely.
Being a part of the oldest wargaming community on the net.
If you are already a member then feel free to login now.
Pure speculation but if a model with a 2+ save is in cover and say cover grants a +1 to armor will 1+ saves be a thing?
Ala the old chaos knights from warhammer X edition?
What about hard cover granting a +2 save perhaps? Hence a 0+ but then modified by weapon modifiers?
Or will they cap it out at 2+ minimum?
Dman137 wrote:
goobs is all you guys will ever be
By 1-irt: Still as long as Hissy keeps showing up this is one of the most entertaining threads ever.
There will definitely be ways to get a 1+ save. Terminators in cover. However, almost absolutely 100% for sure, saving throws of "1" will still fail. So, in effect, it's a 2+ save that resists being modified a bit.
Galef wrote: If you refuse to use rock, you will never beat scissors.
This is a real thing in AoS but its not as bad now because when the Generals Handbook was released they introduced the 3 Rules of 1. I'm sure 40k will have some for baked in automatically.
Nothing says you can't have rolls of 1 always fail in your games in any case.
I doubt it, but it would be neat. Terminators would actually have reason to use cover for small arms fire.
I mean would this really be game breaking?
Galas wrote: I remember when Marmatag was a nooby, all shiney and full of joy. How playing the unbalanced mess of Warhammer40k in a ultra-competitive meta has changed you
Bharring wrote: He'll actually *change his mind* in the presence of sufficient/sufficiently defended information. Heretic.
